Ok, first of all:
>>23, >>24, >>25, >>26
Blatant same person. This is just D-level horseshit.
Secondly, your post is basically a self-repeating mess so I guess I'm going havta show you how the adults do it and try to keep this brief.
Listen: We are not talking about torture, rape or murder.
They are different because circumcision is a harmless procedure that won't result in tetnus, perminant/memorable emotional distress or death. There's millions of circumcised people walking around just fine. They're fucking (and enjoying it), givin' birth, they're even occupying Palestine! I'm sure you'll find that there's a whole world of circumcised people once you take this in-house fag-a-thon of yours on a world tour.
"Again, the burden of proof is not on me to proove it is painful, but on you to proove it isn't. Until you proove to me it isn't painful as fuck, it is reasonably safe to assume it is based on basic knowledge of human anatomy."
I already know it's painful, it just doesn't mean anything if you can't experience it. What kind of fucktard cries about losing a little piece of flesh when he was 2 weeks old? You must be 'shrooming. I've lost more flesh combined over the last 20 years, than I ever had on my dick and the pain was real. As a matter of fact, I'm pinching what's left of foreskin right now--- I don't feel shit. Oh gee I wonder why that is--- IT'S BECAUSE I'M NOT A PUSSY.
"My argument was NOT that female and male genital mutilation are the same thing."
O RLY?
Taken from >>20: "It has many of the negatives of female genital mutilation." --- Sounds like you think they're pretty similar. Guess what, you fucking shitsack:
They're not.
I don't see anything wrong with wishing you had your whole penis so you could enjoy sex more. While there aren't a lot of people who are like this, some are.
The reason you don't see anything wrong with people wishing they were "whole" so they could
hypothetically enjoy sex more it is because you're bat-shit insane (and probably a virgin). Anyone with this much interest in baby cocks is begging for party-van status. Jack off to infants on your own time, pedo.
"It isn't the difference that matters to me. What matters to me is that babies are being abused in painful ways for no legitimate medical reason which will negatively effect the overall quality of life for them long term. And of course consent is not had."
Taken from >>21: Now, the REASON these things should not being your concern is because when it comes to male circumcision they do not effect your or the person's overall quality of life. If you continue to insist that this is not the case, then you have to provide examples that are not only peer-reviewed and scientifically true, but they have to be wide-spread effecting more than 3% of the population.
And we've been over consent already. Children don't have consent for medical procedures until they are at least in their teens, anyway. It's a moot fucking point. Parents aren't going to stop themselves from giving lil' Timmy that flu-vaccine just because he doesn't want it. Sure, Timmy probably doesn't NEED the vaccine but it's the parent's decision as to how they want to raise him, not yours. Tell me: When has a child ever had the ability to express consent in the proper circumstances? Oh wait! I forgot, you don't have kids! You use them for sex toys. Tell me: Did all those babies you probably raped consent to you fucking their newborn assholes? Don't think so, pedo.
So, listen buddy...are we about done here? Because unless you link me to at least 4 ot 5 serious medical cases where hundreds-of-thousands of patients were effected in adulthood by being circumcised as an infant then your argument has no basis other than your homosexual wailings.
Really? I wasn't aware having pieces of your penis sliced off didn't have a negative effect on the person's quality of life. And also, yes, it does make sex less enjoyable, and thus reduces the quality of the person's life.
LOL! WELL NOW YOU KNOW.