I'm not American but I think that Hilary Clinton should become the next president because the fundamentalist Krazy KKKristian neocon Zionist war mongers have terrorized the world for too long, Hilary would also probably allow stem cell research and besides I have always thought she is a cute MILF ;) and it is about time America had it's first female president. If Hilary was president America and the world would be a better place.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-06 10:01
have you heard her stances, she is such a hypocritical flip flopper.
I don't like gay marriage, but then again I don't want to make a law out of it.
I don't like abortion, but we shouldn't amend it
She also wants to protect the children.
Obama sucks also,he has been in politics for what? 3 years?
God, why can't we get a Green or Libertarian in office
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-06 10:05
There's nothing more dagerous, scary and untrustworthy than adult women, especially the older ones.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-06 12:21
>>1
All I have to say is...if you want to fuck Hillary, there is something very very wrong with you. Her own husband won't even tap that ass.
>>2 is more or less correct. She's a career politician with nothing of real substance to her. She's also quite clumsy at politics; the only reason she has been so successful is her association with Bill.
However, we all know the president has absolutely nothing to do with the running of the country; it's all about who they bring with them (Chaney, Rumsfeld, et al. have way more to do with the direction of the country than Bush, in other words).
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-06 16:06
Oh gawd, I'd rather have Kerry in office than Hilary. Everything Hilary does reaks with "fake." I don't think I've ever seen her show a genuine smile or take a stance she can firmly believe in. I'm no big fan of liberals, but I'd take just about anyone over Hilary.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-06 16:38
Chinese:Why did you bomb our country??!
Hillary:oh, you know >:(
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-07 0:43
Obama rules, he's the closest thing to a Green that the Democrats have. And the less someones been in politics the better quite frankly, its a filthy business.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-07 3:17
>>1
"I'm not American but I think that Hilary Clinton should become the next president because the fundamentalist Krazy KKKristian neocon Zionist war mongers have terrorized the world for too long, Hilary would also probably allow stem cell research and besides I have always thought she is a cute MILF ;) and it is about time America had it's first female president. If Hilary was president America and the world would be a better place."
You are sadly misinformed. I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but the fact is is that Hillary Clinton is more pro-war than many of the neo-conservatives. She has actually critisized the Bush administration for not being aggressive enough in terms of foreign policy, and was indeed pushing for war with Iran a while ago.
>>1
"Hilary would also probably allow stem cell research"
The issue at hand is not whether or not people are 'allowed' to conduct stem-cell research, the issue at hand is whether or not the government will handle it, or the market.
"and it is about time America had it's first female president"
This is one of the more sexist comments I have seen. The gender of the president is not important. What is important is the president's policy, and how they stand on the issues.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-07 3:52
kerry > gore > a goat > barack > hillary
I don't care if they are yet another white male president. Besides you get both black and female with Condo and she will be president, no exceptions.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-07 5:17
Obama and Hilary both suck.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-07 19:07
^yes
Name:
Dr. Science2007-01-07 22:43
>>11
I have rationally analysed this statement and I have come to the conclusion that it is 100% correct. Well done.
Explain how Obama "sucks". Please be specific and include links. He opposes the war and wants a phased pullout, which already makes him better than Hilary.
But his middle name is Hussein! And that - that *woman*... She is from San Fransisco and she is assertive and-and-and George Clooney starred in Syriana and-and-and-and FEMINISTS ARE LOOOOOUUUUD AND SCAAAARY!!!!
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-08 14:47
>>14
Obama sucks cause he hasn't done anything, he has been politics for a couple years and essentially is a demagogue
Name:
Xel2007-01-08 14:51
>>22 So America's political scene is disgusting, corrupted and congress should be ousted but somehow not being part of it for very long is a weakness?
I think he should be elected just so that the racist enclave of the LP (oh yeah, and they are plentiful) have something more to weep about.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-08 16:08
Oh god its Xel
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-09 0:51
>>22
what >>23 said. When you are in politics for a long time you become John Kerry or John McCain and you compromise your beliefs for your party's beliefs or the prez's beliefs or whoever will vote for you's beliefs. Obama doesn't do that, he says what he means and he means what he says. And yes, he's affable, it's about damn time we have a president who you know, knows how to talk.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-09 1:08
>>25
Obama appeals to extremist liberals. More bureaucracy, more declaring the middle class "rich" and taxing them as though they own 51% of Shell, abuse of the anti-racist movement by declaring all political critics to be secret racists, more ridiculous welfare schemes that turn otherwise motivated active people into unmotivated lay abouts, overpopulating mass immigration and lopsided economic policies, tax, regulation and subsides.
The Democrats need a Bill Clinton or a JFK, not an Obama. He would still be a better candidate than Hillary though. I'd just be highly concerned if Obama were elected, but if Hillary became president I'd shoot myself in the face.
Name:
Xel2007-01-09 3:51
>>26 Obama's rethoric seems far away from that kind of legislation.
"I'd just be highly concerned if Obama were elected, but if Hillary became president I'd shoot myself in the face." And that is a really deterring possibility for the rest of us is it?
You fucking fail so hard right now that I've got a nose-bleed. It's so painfully obvious that you're talking out of ass. You have no proof for the shit you speak and not even google.com can fuckin' save you.
Obama isn't a Kerry, a Clinton, or a JFK...and THAT'S why he should be elected. Surely, you don't think we need another 4 or 8 years of same shit from the same type of people? You can't just throw the word liberal around and expect that to be a good argument. Shit son, you're not even TRYING.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-09 10:37
>>27
You are shitting me capuccino and cream... He spouts the same "REPUBLIKKKANS ARE EVIL KKKAPITALISTS BLEEURGH!!" nonsense like every liberal you hear on the internet and across the country and he votes for the most liberal policy at every turn without exception. Not that this is unusual for democrats.
"And that is a really deterring possibility for the rest of us is it?"
Because you pathologically hate anyone who criticises the democrat party? Go ahead, you will lose 2008 because Hillary is a crazy bitch.
>>28
Can you be more specific? What is the difference between Kerry, a Bill Clinton, or a JFK and Obama?
Name:
Xel2007-01-09 11:58
>>29 "Because you pathologically hate anyone who criticises the democrat party? Go ahead, you will lose 2008 because Hillary is a crazy bitch." No, I don't. I have a natural aversion towards anyone who makes unfounded claims. You are the hater here. And how would your suicide (or hilarious disfigurement) be *deterring* for someone across the atlantic? It's hardly a perk but it sure as motherfuck is no skin of my nose.
And I assure you that Clinton's sanity is in much less questioning than yours. Also, using the word bitch will not land you much respect among those brains have not been filled with racoon-fur and NRA brochures.
"Kerry, a Bill Clinton, or a JFK and Obama?" Bush, Condoleeza, Goldwater and Guliani? Your cynic psuedo-libertarian memes won't do.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-09 12:08
>>30
I've already given you the proof you've needed, yet you have completely ignored it and now you admit that you support tyranny and would enjoy seeing your political opponents "horrifically disfigured".
""Kerry, a Bill Clinton, or a JFK and Obama?" Bush, Condoleeza, Goldwater and Guliani? Your cynic psuedo-libertarian memes won't do."
What the fuck?
Stay in Sweden you psychotic motherfucker.
Name:
Xel2007-01-09 13:36
>>31 Proof? You have plenty reason to shoot yourself now...
"What the fuck?" All you can do is call some democrats peas in a fascist pod, like all simple-minded high-school/college libertarians that spot this decent, possibly superior ideology. I can think of no one that has made a hard case founding such a statement.
"Stay in Sweden you psychotic motherfucker." No, I want to go to America! I love the idea of living in a society where people have to pay for ambulance rides and the idea of commons is thrown out the window.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-09 13:45
>>32
You were What the fuck'd for a good reason. Explain yourself! Also you seem to know more about the US than you know about Sweden, so why don't you just live here already.
Name:
Xel2007-01-09 13:49
He did not provide proof for his very sweeping statement, and neither have I. he made his claim, and when he has founded it so will I. His words are no more supported than mine, but at least I make no pretense that mine are.
Lets see, just a few weeks ago you critisized me for my willingness to vote republican because I prefer the freedom to keep and bear arms over the freedom to kill fetuses, claiming that this was wrong.
NOW, you are advocating voting for Obama, and in effect choosing one set of liberties over another.
Still have no proof of the shit you speak about Obama. Fail less, lurk moar.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-09 19:17
>>39
Sorry,>>38 is retarded, My problem with Obama has done nothing, and needs to at least need to be in politics for at least 5 more years to see who he really is, I don't give a shit that he can talk good, he needs to actually do something.