>>75
"Smaller "government" like organizations could form, but they wouldn't be able to claim exclusive jurisdiction over areas owned by individuals not voluntarily partaking in that government, or the protection agnecies would start attacking the "government" until it left the involuntarily claimed territory alone."
You are seriously confused. A statelike entity would try to gobble up all its competitors, by force if need be. Ever heard about mob wars? The statelike entity would be stronger than each individual by itself and it would own the protection agency you would employ, and in a matter of minutes it would start taking protection money from you (pay or your dog burns) and since they would be stronger than all alternatives you would be forced to pay. And the only difference in the end would be that before did your taxes at least lead to roads and satelites, now they would only pay for Tonys cigars. Or you would be forced to enter another statelike entity to organize a defense against the hostile one, and this would also demand tax to function. Add couple of years and stir and we are back to where we are now.
Agorism=Exchanging the government for the mob, or worrrrrrsseee!