>>70
"Maybe people look at themselves as individuals, pro tip though; People aren't."
Yes they are. Individuals are real. Collectives are purely fictive entities. They exist only as far as they contain individuals. The collective "purple people" doesn't exist because no individuals are purple.
"You live in a country and you need to contribute to your country to make it a better place."
How was this obligation created? Why do I owe something to someone because I was born in a certain region?
>>71
They can choose to work and buy food. You can always choose whether or not you want to work, and you can always find someone that wants some work done.
I don't get to choose whether or not I get to live in a big cushy mansion rolling in money with servants doing everything for me. But don't I deserve it just as much as anyone else? Society owes me a big cushy mansion. At least, by your logic.
>>72
The market would take the government's place. The market takes the government's place wherever the government doesn't prohibit it. It would take the government's place if the government was giving away free shoes and then suddenly stopped. It would take the government's place if the government was providing free police protection and then suddenly stopped. It would take the government's place if the government was providing free roads and then suddenly stopped. When you go to Walmart, they don't steal from you, they don't charge you according to your income, they charge you according to your consumption.
Agorism is revolutionary. We believe that the end of the state will be the market throwing it off. The effective end of the state is the point where the black market has grown large enough that it can provide better protection than the government's police, and so when the police harass people, the black market protection agencies would protect the people against the police. Smaller "government" like organizations could form, but they wouldn't be able to claim exclusive jurisdiction over areas owned by individuals not voluntarily partaking in that government, or the protection agnecies would start attacking the "government" until it left the involuntarily claimed territory alone. This would prevent other "state-like" entities from forming. Agorist and anarchocapitalist objections to the state's existence are rooted in the involuntary nature of it.
>>74
I'd really prefer you not pay taxes because the government will eventually use that money to commit theft against me. Involuntary taxation is theft, voluntary taxation is an expression of support for theft. If not for the fact that the government will use your money to harass me, I wouldn't care what you did with your money.