Non-liberal non-racist discussion of race.

Liberal views of race are fallacious. So are racist discussions. As I shall now prove.

Instances of race as a social construct do not disprove race as biologically valid, scientific fact cannot be changed by the actions of people. Thus any mention of social constructs is going to be irrelevant to this discussion.

There are documented genetic markers that cause them to have different brain sizes and other various features unique to that race. Negroes for instance have by far the smallest brains, whereas whites and mongoloids have about the same size brain, but with asians beating caucasians, which explains their higher IQs with the Chinese scoring higher than many european counties with higher standards of living.

As much as culture has an effect on a person's ability to learn, by default there is a limit to the complexity of concepts that a person can understand and the speed at which a person can develop an understanding of complex concepts. Not everyone can complete a PHD in theoretical physics. Those who are capable of doing so are genetically superior to those who cannot and denying this fact is an act of discrimination against those people.

Does this mean all negroes are genetically inferior in mental capacity to all mongoloids and should be considerred less human?

No.

Some negroes are more intelligent than mongoloids by genetic default. The differences in intelligence within a race, in groups which have sufficient nutrition and education, are often wider than the differences between races. Racism is inherantly illogical and is not a practical means of discerning what genes we should grant future generations.

What should we make of this?

>>76

I understand all that, idiot, I was refering to philosophical undertones of Laplace's demon. Clearly you understood that with the statement that follows (so I don't know why the first paragraph was even needed):

As for the philosophical claims, saying everything we do is futile and meaningless in some distant amount of time is perhaps  true, yet somehow we must still reconcile with that fact. >>73 just leaves something to be desired, but then again, all philosophical ponderings on this question will come up short. I'm not sure myself what to really think, though >>73 is right in one respect -- that we should live anyway, no matter futile it is.

You still don't get what he was saying. How this shit keeps flying over your head is beyond my understanding. Clearly, you're used to only hearing what you want to hear and responding to what you want to respond to.

He never said everything was futile and meaningless. That's what you inferred, just like you continue to infer that a combination of skin pigment and different culture = race, even though you have failed at identifying the biological mechanism for race.

Quantum Physics doesn't undo any of the philosophical undertones of Laplace's demon and you wouldn't even utter such a thing if you understood Quantum Physics. So, let's see...you fail at Quantum Physics, you fail at Geneology, you fail at debate.

Don't think any of us have ignored the fact that you've basically been repeating yourself without offering any basis for your backasswards and juvenile claims. You shouldn't even bother posting if you're just going to go around spewing bullshit and shouting "Leftist! Socialist!" and shit. It's old and reeks of the inherant faggotry in your thought processes.

Fail less, lurk moar.