Non-liberal non-racist discussion of race.

Liberal views of race are fallacious. So are racist discussions. As I shall now prove.

Instances of race as a social construct do not disprove race as biologically valid, scientific fact cannot be changed by the actions of people. Thus any mention of social constructs is going to be irrelevant to this discussion.

There are documented genetic markers that cause them to have different brain sizes and other various features unique to that race. Negroes for instance have by far the smallest brains, whereas whites and mongoloids have about the same size brain, but with asians beating caucasians, which explains their higher IQs with the Chinese scoring higher than many european counties with higher standards of living.

As much as culture has an effect on a person's ability to learn, by default there is a limit to the complexity of concepts that a person can understand and the speed at which a person can develop an understanding of complex concepts. Not everyone can complete a PHD in theoretical physics. Those who are capable of doing so are genetically superior to those who cannot and denying this fact is an act of discrimination against those people.

Does this mean all negroes are genetically inferior in mental capacity to all mongoloids and should be considerred less human?

No.

Some negroes are more intelligent than mongoloids by genetic default. The differences in intelligence within a race, in groups which have sufficient nutrition and education, are often wider than the differences between races. Racism is inherantly illogical and is not a practical means of discerning what genes we should grant future generations.

What should we make of this?

>>54

Your limited capacity for understanding the simpliest of concepts is disheartening and bordering on annoying. You clearly don't understand what's being said.

Documented racial differences =/= actual racial differences if you can not accurately define a mechanism for race. Making a co-relations isn't science. I keep repeating this because you just don't seem to understand.

It's not that I "feel calling them racial markers might make people racist"...it's that "calling them racial markers have created the entire notion for race". In the past it was a simply matter of not being from a certain culture or group of people. Race is a recent concept not inherant in nature and without any fundamental mechanisms so race doesn't exist.

This isn't hard to understand, dividing people up into race based on skin pigments would be like dividing people up into race based on height or hair color. It's silly, stupid and science is hard pressed to respect the notion.