Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Non-liberal non-racist discussion of race.

Name: Potato !jp5ehZeLaE 2006-12-29 2:02

Liberal views of race are fallacious. So are racist discussions. As I shall now prove.

Instances of race as a social construct do not disprove race as biologically valid, scientific fact cannot be changed by the actions of people. Thus any mention of social constructs is going to be irrelevant to this discussion.

There are documented genetic markers that cause them to have different brain sizes and other various features unique to that race. Negroes for instance have by far the smallest brains, whereas whites and mongoloids have about the same size brain, but with asians beating caucasians, which explains their higher IQs with the Chinese scoring higher than many european counties with higher standards of living.

As much as culture has an effect on a person's ability to learn, by default there is a limit to the complexity of concepts that a person can understand and the speed at which a person can develop an understanding of complex concepts. Not everyone can complete a PHD in theoretical physics. Those who are capable of doing so are genetically superior to those who cannot and denying this fact is an act of discrimination against those people.

Does this mean all negroes are genetically inferior in mental capacity to all mongoloids and should be considerred less human?

No.

Some negroes are more intelligent than mongoloids by genetic default. The differences in intelligence within a race, in groups which have sufficient nutrition and education, are often wider than the differences between races. Racism is inherantly illogical and is not a practical means of discerning what genes we should grant future generations.

What should we make of this?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-05 2:13

>>46

Uh, no.

Taken from the "Racial Pride" thread:

Biology implies biological difference due to effects from environment and culture; not absolute and fundamental "racial differences". Race is an "after the fact" definition for those biological differences not the defining mechanism for those differences.

Unless your truth was deduced using scientific method, then you are basing your opinion on mere co-relations and not identifying any mechanisms. Without the mechanism for race (IE - a specific race gene), you have no basis for believing in race outside of the fact that everyone else seems to. This alone, above all else makes you wrong. I'm sorry that you're having trouble grasping and accepting that. No one here is denying the truth or reality, you're just misinformed, uneducated and more like than likely genetically inferior.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List