Non-liberal non-racist discussion of race.

Liberal views of race are fallacious. So are racist discussions. As I shall now prove.

Instances of race as a social construct do not disprove race as biologically valid, scientific fact cannot be changed by the actions of people. Thus any mention of social constructs is going to be irrelevant to this discussion.

There are documented genetic markers that cause them to have different brain sizes and other various features unique to that race. Negroes for instance have by far the smallest brains, whereas whites and mongoloids have about the same size brain, but with asians beating caucasians, which explains their higher IQs with the Chinese scoring higher than many european counties with higher standards of living.

As much as culture has an effect on a person's ability to learn, by default there is a limit to the complexity of concepts that a person can understand and the speed at which a person can develop an understanding of complex concepts. Not everyone can complete a PHD in theoretical physics. Those who are capable of doing so are genetically superior to those who cannot and denying this fact is an act of discrimination against those people.

Does this mean all negroes are genetically inferior in mental capacity to all mongoloids and should be considerred less human?

No.

Some negroes are more intelligent than mongoloids by genetic default. The differences in intelligence within a race, in groups which have sufficient nutrition and education, are often wider than the differences between races. Racism is inherantly illogical and is not a practical means of discerning what genes we should grant future generations.

What should we make of this?

Don't you know anything about science? When scientists want to look at the effects of a particular property they equalise all other other properties and examine what happens when the particular property is changed.

Do you realise the distinction between possibility and capability? Yes, total brain mass shows little correlation with intelligence, but do you actually think that the brain does not play a part in intelligence whatsoever? The neo-cortex (thinking part of the brain) shows a strong correlation with intelligence. This is why apes have sloped foreheads as the neo-cortex is at the front top of the brain.

If you have a small neo-cortex, you are incapable of getting a PHD (unless it is a phd in mexico studies or something). If you are capable of getting a phd, then it is of course a matter of the quality of your education. Bear in mind it isn't just a case of rememberring as much as possible, the largest part of coursework and exams always requires you to develop and analyse things on your own quickly and correctly. The only way to do this is to have a large neo-cortex capable of examining very large amounts of information in just a few thought processes, even someone with a small neo-cortex which has been tuned into an analysis machine can only contemplate a limited number of concepts at a time.