Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

9/11=terrorism?

Name: Sim Sala Bin Laden 2006-12-22 23:12

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed at least 100000 civilians. These were not military targets. Japan was a military dictarorship at the time, the people had not elected the people in power and had no authority to sway them in any way, and therefore not responsible for any action that regime took.
They were not warned that their homes would be bombed by a weapon that their shelters could not protect them from.
How would you defend this without justifying the attack on WTC on 9/11?

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-26 13:15

>>32
You are mixing up cause and effect intentionally as you enjoy bullshitting especially if it hurts americans. The effects of the nukings were not the reasons why the US did it. The primary reason from the highest level was simply to put an end to world war 2 without any terms that might risk future war, they had tried every means possible to do so up to the point where they had a choice of a land invasion of Japan or forcing a surrender using nuclear weapons. They firebombed major industrial areas for months, but the Hirohito wouldn't surrender, so they used an atomic bomb, still Hirohito didn't surrender, so they used another nuclear weapon and finally he did surrender.

The Chinese and other nations had endured years of terrorisation and atrocities from the Japanese, world war 2 had dragged on for 6 years and cost well over 50 million lives by that point. Who would want a continuation of the war?

It would have been evil NOT to use nuclear weapons.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List