9/11=terrorism?

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed at least 100000 civilians. These were not military targets. Japan was a military dictarorship at the time, the people had not elected the people in power and had no authority to sway them in any way, and therefore not responsible for any action that regime took.
They were not warned that their homes would be bombed by a weapon that their shelters could not protect them from.
How would you defend this without justifying the attack on WTC on 9/11?

>>13
Thats just silly, hiroshima was ok because japan got richer afterwards? And WTC was wrong because US is pisspoor now?

>>14
When hiroshima happened the outcome was allready certain, Germany had surrendered and Soviet Russia had started to attack Japan. There were no countries left to liberate. But even if there were, 100000 civilians for a country is ok? Isnt a few hundred radicals for 3000 in the same scale in the same scale? It doesnt sound completely different for me, who are also a moral relativist. And besides that, shouldnt it at least be seen as a warcrime?