NJ now has gay marriage under a silly name

"Civil unions". Name's a gimmick to appease teh conservatives. w00t for the fags and dykes and girly-mans and ladyboys and bippies and Amber-chans, and Ranma 0.5 and the butt thumpers and Xena worshippers!

>>2
Dead wrong, flip and reverse that. Libertarians are totally against state sponsored marriage in the first place. Any libertarian that can justify gay marriage to be correct belongs in the democrat party not the libertarian. Hell im even against civil unions for any gender, what’s the point of these policys? Can someone explain? Do me and my gf really need sanction from the state to spend our lives together? If no, why even have them? Im totally baffled when i take a look at these policys and dont understand why anyone pushes them in any form