Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

we should just annex mexico

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-15 7:07

"we" being 4chan. or the US. They're both better than Mexico.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-15 13:57

Agree. IT owuld be doing something we should have done in 1848 or 1916 when we had the chance.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-15 15:44

Fuck it.  Just buy the shitty country, and half of South America while we're at it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-15 16:33

>>3
Great idea!  Then no more illegal immigrants!

Oh, wait, shit, that'd fuck-up our economy.  Lets just nuke 'em.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-15 16:54

Mexico seems to have 2 choices for governemnt
1: Kleptocracy
2: Socialism

In truth it is more like this

1: Kleptocracy
1, subsection A: Socialist elite paid off by kleptocrats to look like they are doing something.

Socialism is inherantly flawed and incorrect, it is not self healing like libertarianism where criticism is INVITED. Socialists happily use extremists tactics and support a "dictatorship of the proletariat" without thought as to the consequences, because of course anyone who disagrees with the socialist elite must be an evil spy paid off by the kleptocrats...

I don't believe the socialist movement should be divided into libertarian and socialist. I believe supporters of socialism should inject a huge amount of libertarian philosophy into their values and begin challenging their leaders to start prosecuting evil coorporations for the crimes they enjoy bitching about or get the fuck out. When they get the fuck out they should be replaced by a large number of libertarian representatives of the people who gain more from performing their constituent's wishes than directing people's anger away from the real criminals.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-15 17:00

>>5
Oh point in note I admit that libertarian representatives are capable of corruption, whilst socialists refuse to admit this. Their leaders prefer to be seen as infallible.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-15 17:02

anonymous fails at ideologies.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-16 1:41

>>7
No, I succeed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-16 17:48

>>5

As an add on for those who cant figure it out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleptocracy

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-16 18:48 (sage)

This thread is made of boring, jingoistic horseshit, that not only makes foreigners hate us, but is mindnumbingly impractical (i.e. what the fuck are you going to do with that many Mexicans when you already don't like the immigrants we have)

Sage for too full of shit even for 4chan's /newpol/

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 22:44

what if we didn't annex them, but just invaded them and replaced their shit government with a better more american government, then we pull out, and take all their oil to fund the occupation & regime change?

the oil would pay for the regime change so american taxpayers wouldn't need to

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 22:46

>>11 which would then solve our oil crunch problem as well.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-18 3:46

If 4chan ever annexes Mexico, it ought to decorate Teotihuacan and Mexico City with anime character art! (and hentai inside red-light district brothels, of course)

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-18 13:29

Why don't we just invade, exterminate them all and then sell the land to good productive americans.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-20 22:39

>>11 best solution

Name: The Wanker 2006-11-21 15:14

I think perhaps we should instead talk about the USA getting the fuck out of Latin American, and leaveing the country alone.

Right wing loons. Most igorant yanks doesnt know the diffrences between socalisim, and communism.

Britian has been a socalist country since the end of the second world war. (Ironicly it seems that cretin Tony Blair is trying to fix this_ Most of Euprope is socalist.

See what free market capitalism has done to the states. Turned it into a right wing hell hole. Sadly Europe will soon follow.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-15 8:25

5252

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List