>>11 I think I know more about American politics and American problems than the average American, but this is just theoretical knowledge so you have a point.
Also, parents have no right to limit any cultural expressions whatsoever, and they have absolutely no right to demand anti-secular, anti-feminist political impositions on their societies in order to create some illusion of stability and conformity around their kids. If they have to wage war on the culture around them they do so intellectually and spurring a more sensible zeitgeist, not by trying to create conformity (for example, by imbuing a child with rational values and becoming a constructive parent you can have all manners of filth and dumb behavior around a child - its mind will stand firm without religious indoctrination or censorship. That child will spread a more sensible culture.)
The problem with Hilary is that she is using the symbolic, emotional spectrum of politics to appeal. The sort of promises that appeal to stressed-out parents who are too lazy to give their children strong mental bases and instead try to destroy video-gaming or prevent all children in a school from getting correct sex-ed. The centrists will not listen because she appears radical by default anyway, the conservatives will shut their ears and scream "BLOWJOBBLOWJOBHOMO-FEMINISTAGENDA" and the base will dislike her because she appears preachy, capable of selling-out and dixiewhistling. This whole "Oh she is fucking nuts"-debate is uninteresting.