Western Values

Western values (http://tinyurl.com/yhm4kw) should be preserved and defended, for the good of all humanity.

>>40
stinky poophead said: "Anti-chan has anger issues"

nuh uh.
thast mean/
u dont knpow what you are talking about.

faggot.

>>41 Somehow I doubt it's the same Antichan...but I could be wrong.  Maybe Anti-chan is a moniker for someone purposefully acting like a jackass?  I'm not completely familiar with all of 4chan's memes yet.

>>39
>>40

Hello fuckers. This is 4chan. You're toilets and I'm a puckered anus unleashing torrents of shit on your faces for great justice. Explain to me; in sorted detail why on a website where nigger, kike and baby rape memetics stand together as equals, should I not seek to destroy fuckbrain wielders of shitty logic using a couple of insults?

The problem is, you fuckers are too fucking soft. You've got literal retards leading your countries, vapid watered down ideologies running your societies and you're whining that I shouldn't talk shit or at the very least piss on some moron's  (lack of) intelligence?

Is this really debate? I don't think so. I don't think I should have argue the truth, when I know it's the truth. I don't think I should have to respect stupidity. And the truth is if I actually had my way I wouldn't argue with anyone who appeared illogical to me. I'd end their life in the most cold and callous way possible as punishment for dragging down the collective consciousness of the entire human species. If I could, I'd eliminate their souls and any memories anyone ever had of them.

In summation: Any and all qualms or problems me stem solely and only from feelings of inadequacy in yourselves. If I'm right, I'm right. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. But don't bitch out and run off about "anger issues" and start fagifying yourself because I threw a couple of insults around. That's just silly.

Did I mention that this is 4chan?

*yawn*

Long story short the west has done some pretty bad things, but every nation culture creed and race has an evil history. Singling out one group is wrong, if you have to write about the evils committed by a particular group and that group only, have the common courtesy to make it clear that all humans are capable of evil and you do not wish for your facts to be used to skapegoat or persecute the group you are talking about.

See? I told you.

hi2u/>>43/

>>44

And you just crossed the line.

Objectively speaking, singling out one group is wrong. But subjectively, when dealing with our present-day society, isn't wrong. If you can't single out what evil is, then you're trying deny the reality of evil.

We can say for sure that (under certain circumstances) alot of things the west has done to the rest of the world are what we, westerners, would percieve as immoral, wrong, or evil. The message in the article is simple: The west ceases to be the western when it stops following it's own values.

And you just crossed the line.
lawl is dat sum e-penis bravado there?

What are you going to do? Scream obscenities at him while covering your screen in spittle?

>>47

You're funny. You feel like I'm spitting venom, all with my face twisted up in anger, so you assume I'm sitting here all worked up and shit. Meanwhile, my shit flows free into your mouths with very little effort or discomfort.

Every notice that everytime you bring up "Anti-Chan anger issues" you completely and utterly fail at even coming close to refuting my arguments? I mean, can you at least show me how I'm wrong first or is all the fecal matter really that distracting? Somehow I doubt that, you've a got the demenor of someone that gets shit on daily. You should be used to it.

What I meant was: He crossed the line, from right to wrong. Simple as that. But of course you assume it's about some other shit. Why this is the case is written in >>43

I'm not trying to refute your issues, guy. I don't even know what this thread is about.

I'm mocking you. It's so much fun!

I concur with >>49.  There's nothing to refute anymore; the thread is impossible to follow because of all the free venom all over it.  An interesting opening topic, but this thread is weighed down by copious quantities of fail.

We'd be better off bringing this arguement up another time.
If I'd started this thread, I wouldn't have wanted to be the one whose conduct killed it.

>>49
>>50

This thread started to fail the moment you weepy little pointdexter fucks started up with your whining. "Wahhh, my bed is too small! This cock in my ass is too big." You don't seem to understand the inherant fucktardedness of bitching about swear words and insults on 4CHAN.

This argument pretty much ended with >>46

>>46
"Objectively speaking, singling out one group is wrong. But subjectively, when dealing with our present-day society, isn't wrong."
Since this is all subjective and has nothing to do with science or the court of law, who decides how large the white skin tax is? Al Sharpton or David Duke?

Your argument doesn't make any fucking sense. If you have to "advance coloured people" (and ignore unfortunate white people for being white?) why not take the money off people who have been proven to be racist. You'll never get white people to vote for black reparations or whatever if you tell them they are guilty of a magical subconscious form of racism they were unaware of and should be punished.

>>51
fapfapfap

>>52

What the hell are you on about? Your analogy makes no sense.

Try again.

Both of you sound like arts majors.

>>55

...and you sound like you major in cum farts.

Shouldn't you be busy protectile vomiting sperm into a gaybath house's jizzbucket?

>>56 You have absolutely no clue of how poorly your parents raised you, huh?

>>54
what's there to understand, the question is:
whose subjectivity is the correct one? and how is this decided?

talebans think america is evil, america think talebans are evil.

who's "right"?

There is something to be said for the core hypocracy pointed out in the article.  If the west does not follow it's own values, and doesn't attempt to live up to its ideals, it ceases to be "The Enlightened West" and becomes just another region with it's own self-centered, self aggrandizing ideology, just like everybody else.

>>57

What parents, fool? I was raised by The Predator. Ever see that movie? That guy was impossible to grow up with. Evertime I asked him something, like, I dunno: "Dad how why did you leave/kill Mom?" ...and it's straight to the that fucking thing on forearm. He was so avoidant that I think I developed some issues with intamacy and such.

...at night I can still hear the beeping. :(

Get with the program liberals... NOT EVERYONE IN THE WEST IS EVIL. This has been the jist of every counter argument since this thread started. If you are going to continue saying THE WEST DID THIS THE WEST DID THAT you immediately fail every debate. "The west" consists of 100 millions of people, you can't tar them all with the same brush. There is no such thing as collective guilt.
>>59
The thing is not everyone in the west is going around claiming the west is perfect. So whatever the article is trying to do, it certainly doesn't apply to good people in the west. Much like neo-con crap doesn't apply to good muslims, even though they try to pass off all muslims as guilty of something.

You are essentially what you despise the most. It reminds me of grade school when the kid next to your farts and calls you a "farty farty poo pants". Even though they know they are the true "farty farty poo pants", they prefer to shift the blame at the cost of humiliating themselves rather than be humiliated by others. It's a sad state of affairs when someone elveates pride above truth. It also suggests they have a low mental age.

Get with the program liberals...
lol is dat sum indoctrination dere?

It's pretty sad when a person so unthinkingly paints with such a broad brush. It really lowers the quality of discourse.

>>62

I know. That's why I started paint with a such a broad brush, except I don't use paint...I use shit.

Slippy. Drippy. Soupy.

Shit.

>>62
>>63
Thnaks for admitting what you are trying to do?

>>64
A+++++++ good reasoning, will argue again.

What Truth?

Who's Justice?

Why the American Way?

>>66
Scientific fact.

That all humans are made equal and have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

It is not the american way, it was merely adopted by americans and it was chosen because it generates happiness in people presently and in those who will exist in the future.

All humans aren't made equal.

That doesn't mean they shouldn't be given equal rights, however.

The western way creates the best standard of living for its' citizens than any other society at any time, ever. It is vastly suprerior to any of its' alternatives. People who do not understand this point should be given a free one-way ticket to the country of their choice in order to immerse themselves wholly into their preffered society.