Population Control

I've been reading and I've come to a conclusion that a majority of the world's problems could be diminished by reduction of Developed nations' populations.
Think about it;
Lower population decreases the strain on the environment.
Lower population decreases the cost of goods.
Lower population decreases the strain of social programs.
Lower population lowers unemployment.
Lower population raises wages.
Lower population increases the attention that teachers can give to students.
Lower population encourages more attention put towards a smaller number of children by parents.
Lower population decreases the spread and contagiousness of disease.
Lower population decreases some of the pressures that lead to crime.
Lower population decreases poverty.


Of course, all of these would have to be accomplished by allowing abortions and a change towards "abstinence only" education in public schools.

Nations such as Japan and Italy are reporting negative population growths, coupled with inproved standards of living and higher incomes.

>>22

That's a pretty big fuckin' whoop if it completely dismantes your stinker of a thesis, you miserable shitstick. So, you wiki'd Malthusianism? This is not relevant to the discussion at hand and no one here gives a fuck.

What's being discussed here isn't Malthusian, but instead an existential crisis that has been around since we discovered that we're from a handful of Sub-Saharan survivers. And more so since we've demystified nature itself. You need to shut the fuck up, sit the fuck back and save the egotistical dick jerking for those furry forums we're all certain you visit on a regular basis.