Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Forced vasectomies on all males

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-28 13:27

Once a male reaches puberty, it will be mandatory for him to get a vasectomy.  Of course, before this they will freeze some of his semen for future use if he wishes.  This will solve the problem of teenage and unwanted pregnancies.  More importantly, we'll no longer have to argue over abortion.

Nobel Prize, here I come!

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-06 8:40

When I become king everyone will have to pass apply for license and take an IQ test in order to be a parent. Stupid will not be allowed to breed, period. Failure to follow the rules will result in immediate sterilization for both and the child being adopted out.

It's too bad the Nazi's gave eugenincs such a bad name.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-06 10:56

>>39 Oh, I see, I'm 'uneducated' and 'anti-feminist' for disagreeing with the idea of having forced vasectomies for all males? If that makes me 'anti-feminist', so be it, I am a damn proud anti-feminist. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-06 11:58

I concur. Just because someone disagrees with your radical agenda doesn't mean they are stupid. They merely approve of less insane measures.

In other words, your insane ideas will never be recognized and implemented, just kill yourself and leave us all alone.

Name: Xel 2006-10-06 12:20

Forced vasectomies on rapists is a wonderful, acceptable solution.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-06 14:26

>>44
Why exactly?  It's not like a vasectomy will stop you from raping again.

Name: Xel 2006-10-06 15:00

>>45 Renoval of schlong then, or some kind of incapacitation.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-06 16:15

Name: Xel 2006-10-06 17:09

Thanks for setting me straight. But cruel and unusual is such an ambiguous border. Nah, there are probably better solutions.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-06 22:49

>>46
fantastic idea!

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-06 23:29

Your nobel prize is running away from you while you chase after it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-07 7:57

>>46
>>49
Killing the rapists would be far better idea. There was some experiments with this in past. It lead to rapists totally losing their minds and they started killing and torturing their victims instead of raping.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-07 9:38

>>51
That would be a waste of money. They should be put to work in a lead factory or something.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-07 12:05

This is all bullshit.  What we should focus on is ARMING people so that they don't have to worry about being robbed, raped, murdered, etc, you name it.  In counties that have made gun ownership mandatory, there has been an almost 90% drop in rape, for example.  I think the best solution is to prevent it from happening to begin with.  If you don't want to get beaten up, raped, robbed, or murdered, buy a firearm and carry concealed.  Problem solved.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-07 12:07

>>53
Arm people AND send rapists to the lead factories. How does that sound?

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-07 21:07

>>40
"It was more dangerous, but no one was there to firebomb you for making a descision about your own body."

More like making a decision about someone elses' body.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-08 8:52

>>53
can you show me your sources?

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-08 11:55

Your suggesting that we modify human beings in order to balance society!? Do you not realize your ignorance!? By allowing this "Customization" of the human form you are taking away an aspect of human behavior leaving them just that little closer to being no more than a compensatory of atoms. It is this unpredictability of the chemical changes in the body that cause life to be interesting and worth living. Yes they can cause pain but so do emotions, do you suggest we remove them also and truly become no better than objects?

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-08 12:59

>>57
So you think intelligent healthy people should be stamped out of the gene pool whilst people with dehabilitating genetic disease and cerebral palsy should be paid to have loads of children?

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-08 13:16


>>58
...OK, yah lost me there. How does what that guy said even suggest something like that? All he's said is not to mess with peoples body and minds because it makes them less human or something.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-08 14:28

>>56 Certainly. 

http://www.gunowners.org/fs0404.htm

It is in there.  Use your 'find' function (typically CTRL+F) and search for "Criminals avoid armed citizens".  The area in question is Kennesaw, GA.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-10 0:23

>>60 Nice.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-10 3:09

>>40
the problem is most people don't know what those precautions are.
yeah, there's protection and birth control. that takes care of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, for the most part. but what about the emotional and social ramifications of a sexual relationship? a lot of people aren't mature enough to handle it. how does one protect against that?

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-10 5:06

>>62

To answer that, i must quote you a passage of a book:

"Here's what the Encyclopedia Galactica has to say about alcohol. It says that alcohol is a colourless volatile liquid formed by the fermentation of sugars and also notes its intoxicating effect on certain carbon-based life forms.

The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy also mentions alcohol. It says that the best drink in existence is the Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster."

hope that helps.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-10 23:49

>>60
Rapists think with their penises, not their brains, guns would likely be ineffective, as many rapes involve alcohol and the criminal's judgement would be impaired.

You could kill the rapist then, but unless he tries anything, you'd get the family sueing you for being too harsh to a dumb drunk.

Or then we can open the can of worms that rumors that 25% of reported rapes didn't happen.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-11 1:54

rape is about power, not sex. so no, rapists dont think with their penises, they think with their brains. it's just that the thought process consists of urges to control and dominate.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-11 2:21

This would likely end mankind.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-11 20:11

Rape is probably the worst thing one humanbeing can do to another. It does massive dammage to the vitctims spirit that may take a lifetime to get over. I know this because my g/f was raped by her uncle when she was 12 years old. Even now when we have sex its hard for her because it brings up painfull memories.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-11 20:22

>>67
What about a decade of horrific torture which generates extrem pain? That has to be worse.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-11 21:13

>>67
>>68

For serious. What about the painful memories that a FORCED VASECTOMY would bring up?

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-12 0:34

>>69
I still think a decade of continuous horrific torture would be worse.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-12 1:05

>>70

Why constitutes as torture to an entire group of people? Slavery? Genocide? Holocaust? What if totalitianism or facsim was a form of torture?

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-12 1:17

>>71
?
Fix grammar pls.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-12 19:57

>>72
PSSSTT I THINK THERE MITE BE SOME JAPS POSTING IN HEAR

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-12 20:54

>>69 But that would only harm men, and the vasectomies would be helpful to women so who cares.  Fuck men.  If men didnt exist neither would the worlds problems.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-12 21:38

>>74
gb2 Canada

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-14 19:33

>>74

"LOL if people didn't exist they wouldn't complain!!!11!!!"

Stop being an idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-14 20:47

I'm charging my semen.

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-14 22:13

>>74
if I met you IRL i would rape your ass and shit in your mouth. And I'd enjoy it. it should be legal to rape feminazis like you :)

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-14 23:45

>>78 Aww, did someone hurt your penis?

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-15 0:48

>>79
No it's your period.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List