Forced vasectomies on all males

Once a male reaches puberty, it will be mandatory for him to get a vasectomy.  Of course, before this they will freeze some of his semen for future use if he wishes.  This will solve the problem of teenage and unwanted pregnancies.  More importantly, we'll no longer have to argue over abortion.

Nobel Prize, here I come!

this entire thread is dumb as shit, i'm a male, and all i can say is wtf?
like seriously, wtf?
firstly, forced vasectomies on all males? why? because women won't get raped and they won't have babiez all the time.
As someone stated earlier, vasectomy doesn't make one incapable of  sexual pleasure, so i suppose women would still get raped?
and as someone else also stated earlier, women have a part in getting pregnant as well. they can tell the guy he MUST wear a condom, they can take the pill, there are different kinds of female contraceptions, and i know the "the-day-after" pill has just been introduced in the US (we've had it here for a while). And if you fail to use any of those things, both from the male and the female side, then there's always abortion.

secondly, do you really, HONESTLY think, that the world would be a better place if it was controlled only by women? and if so, why?
"ohh, it's because women are good natured. nurturing sweethearts that only want the best for everybody" yeah... right...
I'm not saying women shouldn't be in power, or only men should be in power, but that it should be a mixture, too much of either side lead to a certain unhealthy one-sidedness if you ask me.

To those of you who are all "omg, it's men who aren't able to control themselves, therefor they, and not women, should have vasectomies" well what about female nymphomans? If you want to give all males vasectomies, then i say you should do something similar to women, not because it would be needed physiologically, but to have a sense of equity in society. And if it's not a mans "right" to have sex with a woman and impregnate her, is it then a womans "right" to accept his sperm and carry their child? shouldn't we just take the egg and the sperm and then have some sort of incubation device deal with it. That way we wouldn't have to deal with the "inequality" of women having to be away from the job market during a period of their pregnancy.

anyways, if you have to take rights away, take rights away from everybody, otherwise it's not fair.

now, someone is going to say "BUT IT'S NOT FAIR THE WAY WOMEN HAVE BEEN TREATED FOR THE LAST LONG TIME!!!" well, you're right, only recently has there been a larger level of equality between men and women, but that's not an argument for shifting the inequality the other way. Starting some sort of gender-bloodfeud definately won't solve anything, whether it's unwanted pregnancies or general inequality between men and women.