Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Islam=Pig Turds

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 23:52

Islam is shit. It needs to go. Other religions left the bullshit violence behind centuries ago. Islam is an abomination.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-11 5:11

yup

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-11 6:49

No, no, no. Islam is a religion of peace.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-11 13:14

>>3
Peace through suicide bombing am I rite?

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-11 13:30

Islam is the wrong religion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-21 15:39 ID:QvWgEbrO

know a thing about the religion before you speak of it!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-21 15:50 ID:F60yoWuu

Muhammed banged tight tender underaged girls whose names were Aisha.
Awesome religion!
Very peaceful, btw.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-21 16:08 ID:+Je2wbTY

hitler was really peacefull too, if only everyone had become his minions, noone but the jews would've been hurt at all :/

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-21 17:10 ID:UNgnQNYd

Christians and jews have done quite a lot of bombings as of late. Maybe you been asleep during the 21st century?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-21 21:14 ID:VEAux5iB

Islam is a religion of peace and they'll kill to prove it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-21 21:59 ID:UNgnQNYd

Christians spread freedom and democracy through cluster bomblets and napalm, the time proven american way.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-22 7:51 ID:3+nP+0zv

>>9
>>11
Because dropping propoganda pamphlets over berlin in 1939 would have seen Hitler voted out of office thus ending world war 2?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-22 7:51 ID:3+nP+0zv

>>9
>>11
hahaa fucking naive liberals. You shut the fuck up. Let us fight this war.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-22 9:27 ID:UFeFnfMs

>>12
The bombing of civilians had no proven effect in either WW2, Korea, Vietnam nor Iraq 1 and 2. But since you are part of a religion where human life is holy and peace an ultimate goal, maybe you dont care if the collateral damage is necessary or not. Anyway, you just proved my point, christians are more violent than muslims (meaning theve killed a fuckload more people).

>>13
Yeah, because you have been doing such a great job the latest 5 (five!) years. Wasnt the civil war the last war a republican president won? You conservos should let people who actually are interested in minimizing human suffering do the waring, profit is not a good motivation to end the war as quickly and effectively as possible.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-22 12:39 ID:jcaXFtd8

>>14
Officially, Christians haven't killed anyone since the Pope gave up power over the state (and hence the worldly domain) sometime around the 5th century. In Islam Islam LOL the clerics have always ruled the state.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-22 13:12 ID:3+nP+0zv

>>14
The allies bombed factories aswell retard. You'd make a shit propogandist, anyone can see through your shit. Just give up.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-22 13:14 ID:3+nP+0zv

>>14
Asians have killed more people, because throughout history there have been more of them and they fight as many wars as the next race. Let's persecute and hate asians.

It's funny how the Bush administration isn't actually being racist towards muslims and openly expresses through their actions and statements that they want to help the people of Iraq. On the other thand their opponents call for the genocide of christians.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-23 8:03 ID:K0RjSdCl

>>16
The allies bombed factories as well

yeah, a few. srsly open up a history book and learn a bit more about the subject. historians with the slightest clue agree that the allied bombings were completely out of proportion. and yes, the nazis did worse. so. still not a fine example of peoples' mentality.

(and no i'm not making a point on the subject of christianity vs. islam, that debate is silly imo.)

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 0:06 ID:vQDAw9bH

>>18
What do you think is out of proportion when you are fighting for your life? You've been listening to the historians with the slightest clue. Is this something like the scientific consensus on global warming?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 7:33 ID:Buk5zcX/

>>19

yeah, or that "evolution" thing, fucking god damned scientists and their knowing stuff.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 7:49 ID:DwGpKARt

>>1
A wholeheartedly agree with you're statement.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 12:03 ID:/Z7knUi2

19
What do you think is out of proportion when you are fighting for your life?

Fighting for your life, huh. The strategy behind the bombings was to make the Germans suffer so they would turn against Hitler, which didn't happen since they couldn't worry about that shit in their rubble cities. Strategic merit = none, safe for destroyed factories in _some_ of the cities that had been bombed.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 12:33 ID:IzI/gDAF

>>22
People who's homes have been destroyed are too pre-occupied to work. Also seeing themselves losing the war they are less likely to join the army and fight a pointless cause. So what if they didn't turn against hitler, at least they stopped helping him.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 14:55 ID:xnuMdpPy

>>23
No, it didnt, germanys production peaked at 1944, the bombing especially the bombing of civilian targets had not achieved anything, at least according to the US bombing survey. But maybe you know better. Helpful suggestion: invent a theory on why you have 12 fingers and three eyes. HINT: its connected to your stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 19:40 ID:vQDAw9bH

What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 19:45 ID:Tbd8HOQn

What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?What do your unclueable historians have to say about the bombing of British civilians. Or is that part of the vast right wing conspiracy?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-24 22:40 ID:vQDAw9bH

seems to be an echo in here

Name: Hikitsuri 2007-03-24 23:05 ID:xwNaDXAk

dear goddess...! he has come to this board too?

this racist crap has been spewed forth from his anus all over the lounge, and now into politics again...

YOU FAIL @ INTERNETS

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-25 0:11 ID:ecwwfgGJ

>>28
cry more

Name: Hikitsuri 2007-03-25 0:12 ID:d3XNxgtt

<sob>

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-25 0:22 ID:OqIqQ5B3

>>30
Loser...

Name: Hikitsuri 2007-03-25 0:27 ID:d3XNxgtt

don't talk about your mom like that

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-25 4:37 ID:i5Q5LDGG

>>28

muslims aren't a race, thus it is not racist. gb2/gaia/

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-25 12:21 ID:rLNu+hK9

THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-25 13:45 ID:tBJI0h+c

>>34
well blow somwebody up

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-25 16:55 ID:+XZMkK3g

>>25
What about it? And please remember that the germans were christians, therefore christians bombed british civilians.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-25 18:43 ID:ElE29q4K

>>36
They weren't christians as they supported an un-christian government. 9/11 was perfectly fine in Islamic law. So is raping children.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-25 23:14 ID:+XZMkK3g

>>37
Yeah, you are right, the nazi government sacrificed children to Odin, this must be true because Castle Wolfenstein is very thoroughly researched. And incarcerating children and torture is fine by american law, they must also be moonite satanists!

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-26 0:47 ID:kHi/yhDo

>>38
"incarcerating children and torture is fine by american law"
No it isn't.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-26 10:48 ID:XQ7ckjDp

>>39
Not on american soil no, but in Guantanamo and other places. American law also permits americans to murder other nationals in other countries. You must love the Gandhi like peacefulness of christians!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List