Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

THE CASE AGAINST PORN

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-08 23:21

I quote from an excellent article on http://www.erasethedark.com/ourcase.html

"Every hour in America, sixteen women will encounter a rapist.  Since 1960, rape has risen 500%, and it is reported once every forty-six seconds.  One in eight women will be raped at least once.  Comparatively, in a study of convicted rapists, 86% of the rapists admitted to routine use of pornography, while 57% said that they would actually mimic specific pornographic scenes while raping a woman.

Pornography has grown into a thirteen billion dollar a year industry, and it exceeds the combined revenues of America’s foremost sport franchises--baseball, basketball, and football.

The dual proliferation of pornography and rates of rape in America are not coincidental.  Pornography, rape, and other acts of injustice directly coincide; it is time for the dark perception in society that says pornography is a victimless crime and harmless freedom to be erased."

Go to http://www.erasethedark.com/ and learn about the dangers of pornography to women.  Thankfully, there are great women out there winning battles for women, such as the recent ban on violent pornography in the United Kingdom (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/5297600.stm).

Pornography is vile and disgusting, degrades women, and further legal attention may be needed for women.  The notion that it is simply a 'victimless crime' or a 'harmless freedom' is a dangerous one.  Pornography is harmful to women and women's rights.  Women have the right to live free of the fear of being raped, and free of being regarded as mere sex objects. 

Pornography firmly entrenches in people's minds the notion that women are mere sex objects or hunks of meat.  If we are to have a future in which the sexes are truly equal and a future in which women are respected, pornography must go.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-09 7:50

>>37
How long does it take for a the shit to actualy incapacitate the fuck? How long does it take for a guy to snap a neck after he feels something prick his dick?

Surely, no reason whatsoever not to do it.


>>38
Guns are for the weak, actually being able to exert force on physical objects around you works best, but of course it would help if the society's 'ideal' woman wasn't a goddamn twig.

You're saying porn causes more rape? The very concept that a woman should be skin and bones started in the 60s which is also the time period that stupid site you're referencing says rape numbers have gone up, you want to know what I think causes more rape? Women being overall smaller, having less mass and surely less muscle and general ability combined with the fact that the modern day women is a complete shithead and no one with at least half a mind likes at all or even talks to. And you expect anyone to have remorse for someone like that when regarding the idea of rape? Let alone some mangey guy who likes sex enough to bear even touching one of the nasty things let alone not even caring about the horrible shriek the little monster will let out with its terrible voice. That dude doesn't care about shit and I doubt even if the bitch was a saint (as if) he would care so I guess its completely ok to be the way they are except for the fact they couldnt hope to inflict MASSIVE damage on a human to save their life, LITERALLY.

But hey, maybe if the bitch wasn't a bitch, guys who do know how to hurt people would like to hang out with her? Instead of saying 'fuck you bitch I'm playing videogames' while the bitch being the twat she is has to go out somewhere just to get out of the house or something equally stupid and end up in the situation where these things happen, they'd play some mario 3 or something?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List