THE CASE AGAINST PORN

I quote from an excellent article on http://www.erasethedark.com/ourcase.html

"Every hour in America, sixteen women will encounter a rapist.  Since 1960, rape has risen 500%, and it is reported once every forty-six seconds.  One in eight women will be raped at least once.  Comparatively, in a study of convicted rapists, 86% of the rapists admitted to routine use of pornography, while 57% said that they would actually mimic specific pornographic scenes while raping a woman.

Pornography has grown into a thirteen billion dollar a year industry, and it exceeds the combined revenues of America’s foremost sport franchises--baseball, basketball, and football.

The dual proliferation of pornography and rates of rape in America are not coincidental.  Pornography, rape, and other acts of injustice directly coincide; it is time for the dark perception in society that says pornography is a victimless crime and harmless freedom to be erased."

Go to http://www.erasethedark.com/ and learn about the dangers of pornography to women.  Thankfully, there are great women out there winning battles for women, such as the recent ban on violent pornography in the United Kingdom (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/5297600.stm).

Pornography is vile and disgusting, degrades women, and further legal attention may be needed for women.  The notion that it is simply a 'victimless crime' or a 'harmless freedom' is a dangerous one.  Pornography is harmful to women and women's rights.  Women have the right to live free of the fear of being raped, and free of being regarded as mere sex objects. 

Pornography firmly entrenches in people's minds the notion that women are mere sex objects or hunks of meat.  If we are to have a future in which the sexes are truly equal and a future in which women are respected, pornography must go.

People are making drastic illogical assumptions here...

Porns affects are relative to the person. I doubt that any reasonably rational man would rape someone just because he saw porn. Just because rapists watch porn doesn't make people who watch porn rapists.

As far as the whole child pornography thing goes, (this is moral implications aside) I would have to say that is no different from someone who likes blondes or redheads. That type of pornography satiates his desires in the same way as someone who searches for porn any other variety. It sounds ridiculous I know. But it's just, in affect, being attracted to certain features of an individual. People who suffer from pedophilia who are fantasizing about it with porn instead of actively pursuing it are probably healthier than the person actually seducing children. Although this is crossing some moral thresholds in itself. However, if people can satisfy their sexual needs without harming people than it is fine by me. Although I do not condone it.

I believe that it is sick, but I don't think that it's such a deviant behavior. It's people who actually become sexual predators who are evil. People who look at porn are not criminals.

And honestly who are you people? You're debating this on 4chan. 4CHAN!