GW is a dimwit moron. If he demanded increased torture of muslims I would say keep him in office. Otherwise, he should be flushed with all the other turds.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-07 22:28
By high demand!
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-07 22:57
Very high demand.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-07 23:09
you see this is a common thing. people say things like kick bush out...here...on 4chan. Dont just tell us, sure say it here try to rally support the internet is a good way to form an army but it is pointless to mention it here alone. Write your congressmen or your represintives hell tell your mayor and give resons. Not just "bush is a dumbass".
Isn't the Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush a pro-Nazi who got wealthy from the Third Reich?
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-09 18:01
>>1 Only if we put a libertarian in his place - NOT a democrat.
Name:
Xel2006-09-09 18:21
>>10 Bush should be impeached under any circumstances, at least because he lied abot the size of that perch he caught. If you're willing to allow a lying, unconstitutional president to keep the office just because you want a libertarian succesor, you're not a libertarian.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-09 21:33
>>11
Rather him than an even more unconstitutional and shitty democrat.
id rather have a president who makes the wrong decision then a president who cant make up his mind like kerry. we pretty much got screwed this election as a nation though.
Name:
Xel2006-09-10 4:30
>>12 Well, that still isn't applicable to American ideals. Neither side is more unconstitutional than the other.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 19:02
>>15
The republicans are better on the Bill of Rights. The democrats will shred the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, and 10th amendments. The republicans will shred the 1st, 4th, and 8th amendments. Sure both are bad, but the dems tend to be more willing to piss on the Bill of Rights than the republicans it seems.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 19:25
Why compromise? Vote libertarian.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 19:26
>>14
If we had a viable 3rd party option we would have done fine.. too bad nobody voted libertarian that election.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 22:14
>>18
Libertarian isn't powerful because people won't vote for it even though they want to. Don't compromise. Vote Libertarian.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 22:28
a 3rd party wont work, not with this voting system. you get rid of the electoral college, and change the voting system to IRV, then a 3rd party can have a chance. otherwise, the current voting system will cause 'wasted' votes, and even if the popular vote went to a 3rd party, the electoral college doesn't give a fuck.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 22:40
those who dont know how IRV (instant runoff voting) works, here's a nice and simple guide:
>>20
We have a 3rd and 4th party, hell even a marketable 5th party except people won't vote for them because they think it will be a waste. Well put since they are small parties, your vote matters more and is less of a waste than adding it to the millions of other screaming voices in the 2 mega-giant parties.