Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

9/11 What U think?

Name: Xel 2006-08-27 16:22

Okay. Official version: Al-qaeda did it: If you believe that, Write a 1 and nothing more. If you do not believe that, write a 0 and nothing more.

I'll start.

0

Name: Xel 2006-08-27 16:34

>>1 I'll defend that 0 with this
http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 16:39

0

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 16:55

1/0

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 19:01

OH SHI-

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 20:18

>>2
Your link only argues that Bin Laden did not do it, it says nothing about Al-Qaeda.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 20:37

The French did it because they didn't want to go to war with Iraq.

Name: Anynomous 2006-08-27 22:18

0

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 0:24

2

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 0:34

-4

Name: Xel 2006-08-28 1:11

>>6 What is he the leader of? The YMCA?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 2:37

>>11
According to the link/movie you posted on here earlier about neo-conservatism, Al Qaeda is not organized, and Bin Laden is not a 'leader' but only helps to fund the organization.

Name: Xel 2006-08-28 4:46

>>12 So the attack was carried out by his favorites, yet he was never an accomplice nor aware? Ah, this requires too much investigation in dusty annals.

Name: anonymous frenchman 2006-08-28 11:04

0.5

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 14:31

69

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 15:06

JEWSDIDWTC

Name: Xel 2006-08-28 17:03

>>16 Wolfowitz -a zionist- gladly tugged America into two poorly planned and inadequately justified military operations to flood the market with oil and drop Saudi Arabia off a cliff with the oil prices. Sadly for him, oil companies in Houston and Riyadh caught wind of the oil angle and rendered him and his accomplice Bolton as impotent as possible. And now you have a housing bubble partially because of heating costs and your infrastructure, libraries, liberties and position as democratic citizens have been shot to shit, among other nice things. Start demanding things from both parties and vote surgically, don't just wrap yourselves up in a cottage and mutter about Clinton and multiculturalism or whatever.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 20:14

>>17
>>16 Wolfowitz -a ziJEWS DID WTC*

fix'd

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 22:04

8D

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-05 16:46

11x^7+54x^2-4x+198=4y+5
y=54x^2-4x+197

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-05 17:48

>>20
y=1/0

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-06 0:43

I am not sure. I definitely believe our government had the information that Bin Laden was planning an attack and they failed to act on it. Whether they let it happen, were in on it, or caused it I am not sure. To those of you who believe the conspiracy theories like "Loose Change", to get the full story you should read the responses to it: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=4&c=y
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

They are pretty convincing in debunking the conspiracies. The one thing that doesn't add up to me is the manner in which they fell. If the fires had weakened the steel severely, it most certainly would have affected one side more than the other, rather than heating all steel beam exactly the same. Naturally, it would have weakened the side of the point of impact more. This would make the towers topple to that one side instead of falling straight down. Or, more likely, IMO, the damaged section and above would have just toppled off, leaving the rest standing. Since the building was made to withstand a plane crash, and the lower floors still had full structural integrity, I don't see how it all would have fallen without an inside detonation. Keep in mind that this occured not once, but three separate times, the two WTCs and WTC7. The towers both fell in just one second longer than if they were in a vacuum. And they had thousands of tons of steel, concrete, and glass below them.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-06 1:42

K, nevermind what I just said about the time they took to fall, the loose change guide explains it, I hadn't gotten that far yet. Still though, the way they fell seems fishy. I am leaning towards government failed to act when they knew about it but were not involved.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-06 2:32

911 WAS AN ARAB ATTACK ON THE JEW CAPITAL OF THE WORLD AKA. NEW YORK

Name: Xel 2006-09-06 3:17

Since the fuel was combusted in the outside air so quickly, it simply couldn't have weakened the superstructure sufficiently. It just not make the sense.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-06 6:14

The plane travelled through the facade and into the most resistant part of the building, which happenned to be it's supports, then exploded. The fuel rapidly consumed most of the oxygen before the fire could only consume oxygen sucked from underneath it. The damage to the steel supports combined with the concertina layout of the floor sections meant that when one support failed the entire heated section of support would undergo a resonance cascade, enough to generate enough momentum to caused unheated sections of support to collapse.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-29 12:16

!SWEJ, WE

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-31 14:07

NEVER JEW A JEW

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List