Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Actions on A shamed American

Name: Jose 2006-08-22 0:44

If your so ashamed, as I am, and pissed off, do what a good 1/4 of the republican party political leaders and voters are going to do.

Vote Independent.

If you vote Democrat ( ACLU, Micheal Moore, Illegal invasion supporter, open borders, one world order, etc...) or vote Republican, ( more wars for oil, christianity, open borders, one world order, Mexicos new Transportation office in Oklahoma( spp.gov)),

then you can't be to ashamed of America or are you just a wimpy sheep that is lead by those that are calling for the destroying of america?

Name: Paul 2006-08-22 0:49

Hell no, Power to the People.

No more being led by either party.

Independent Voter here.  Ex Republican and Bush voter.

No more open borders, military dying for oil,

NO MORE ALLOWING FOR THE ILLEGALS TO COME IN AND TAKE THE PLACE OF OUR SERVICE MEN AND WOMEN, THAT ARE BEING INJURED OR KILLED.

THOSE AMERICAN SERVICEMEMBERS THAT ARE BEING LED TO SLAUGHTER FOR OIL, NEW WORLD ORDER, NORTH AMERICAN UNION (NAU, SPP.GOV) AND FOR THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ILLEGALS/TERRORISTS, ETC.. TO ENTER OUR COUNTRY AND DO AS THEY PLEASE.

I AM NOT A SHEEP.  I AM A PROUD, EDUCATED, PATRIOTIC AMERICAN.  JUST AS OUR FORFAHTERS WERE.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 1:32

>>1
It is not as simple as "vote independent." There are those within both parties that are real defenders of freedom, liberty, low taxes, limmited government, the constitution, and our borders.  You might want to take a look at this organization:
http://www.rlc.org/

The problem is that there are so many open-border, anti-national sovereignty, liberal politicians..  If you just vote blanketly for independents, you will alienate those other representatives who really want to make America more free.

If there are no good candidates running on either side... I'd recommend either of these parties:
http://www.constitutionparty.com/
http://www.lp.org/

The libertarians are pro-open border, but they are also consistently pro-liberty, pro-individualism, and pro-national sovereignty.  The constitution party isn't pro-open border, and will defend american sovereignty, but are less pro-liberty than the libertarians.  I could see and understand voting for either, myself, as certain ideas from both of those two are needed to pull us out of the mess we're in.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 5:22

>>3
Fuck the Constitution Party.  There's too much Jesus in it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 5:42

>>4
As if that made any of their ideas less valid...

Name: Xel 2006-08-22 6:11

>>5 Christianity is incompatible with liberty and an open mind.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 6:49

>>5
As a matter of fact, it does.  If they can't respect something as simple as church/state separation there's no point in thinking they can understand any other liberties.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 6:51

>>6
Fail.  The founders were largely religious.

Double fail for hypocrisy, as you support feminism, which is incompatible with liberty itself.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 7:03

>>8
True several of the Founding Fathers were very religious, but they at least understood religion as a personal thing.

Christianity may not necessarily be incompatible with liberty, but the kind that the Constitution Party advocates certainly is.

Name: Xel 2006-08-22 7:06

>>8 There is not one word about religion in Americ'a's written foundation, and the Old Testament promotes slavery and the death penalty.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 7:58

>>10
There isn't one word about the Nazis or fascism in our gun control law we enacted in 1968, but it was very obviously based upon a similar Nazi gun control law enacted in 1938, and the Nazis promote genocide.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 8:01

>>11
Exactly, we need to keep the Christian Nazis out of power.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 9:05

>>12
The christians aren't Nazis.  I also don't see how this relates to what >>11 said, either.

Name: Xel 2006-08-22 9:06

>>13 Christianists gave us Reagan and Bush, so excuse me for not being A-OK with them.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 11:03

>>14
Reagan was a great president, and Bush, while not-so-great, was better than those whom he was running against. 

Name: Xel 2006-08-22 14:18

>>15 I can't agree or disagree yet.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-22 20:51

>>16
Well, we can never know. Although honestly Kerry seemed to be much more scary persona than simple minded Bush.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-23 3:55

Kerry was a vicious anti-gunner.  Of all his votes in all his political history, he has only cast a single pro-gun vote.  Just a single one.  Even on said vote, he first voted against it, then while the camera was watching, he changed his mind and cast his first pro-gun vote.  It was somewhat recent I believe, but I forget exactly when. 

Name: Xel 2006-08-23 4:17

>>18 I don't like repeating myself, but there is more to America and its foundation than guns. The only part of the constitution Bush hasn't fucked with is the 2nd. Is he off the hook now? You expect Americans to rise up once they realize they are frogs in a kettle. Don't rely on that.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List