>>37
>>38
Well, according to literally hundreds of other gay rights groups- you are not only wrong, but you're a very, very, very small (and dumb) minority. Stop trying to sensationalize your little movement.
"And you are trying to drag them in the direction of the democratic party - at the cultural and social expense of everyone, including the minorities in question.
LOL? Are you sure you're talking about me and not somebody else?
An actual democrat, perhaps? Get this:
I'm not even registered to vote. (For
this very, reason!) I don't agree with any politican that makes a grab for gun rights. But to say that gays should be concerned with guns first is basically the ideology of cowards and conformists.
Nearly every bit of guns/weapons control we have now would not be here were it not for the democratic party.
Yeah, but: So what? I mean, are you currectly having trouble getting a gun? I don't understand. You act as if our gun rights have already been stripped from us.
When people hold a general hate or dislike for a minority, rendering that minority defenseless is the last thing a friend of said minority would do.
Like I said: No one is trying to physically disarm gays of their guns. If we lose our gun rights, we ALL lose them and that's not good. I'm simply saying that gays shouldn't ally themselves with people who hate them and consider them social and cultural abominations
I'm a libertarian-conservative, and I don't hate gays, look down upon them, or dislike their lifestyle.
You are a minority.
Yay for personal attacks in political debate!
So you are a baby boomer. Thanks for clairifying that. Your persona (your stupidity) finally makes sense. ^_^