>>36
"Again: Gays don't care about guns."
And this is coming from the supposedly politically correct non-prejudice democrats?
http://www.pinkpistols.org/
"No one is stupid enough to buy into your retarded depiction of homosexuals."
How about your stereotypical depiction of homosexuals as a bunch of girly-men who are fearful of guns? I think your viewpoint is prejudice to say the least, and if I was gay, I would be quite offended.
"Gun ownerhship and self-defense rights are more important"
I guess we agree on /something/.
"but get this: "THE DEMOCRATS"(tm) are no closer to stealing your precious guns than "The Republicans"(tm) are to banning abortions."
Nearly every bit of guns/weapons control we have now would not be here were it not for the democratic party.
"NEWFLASH: MOST OF THESE PEOPLE VOTE REPUBLICAN FOR GUN OWNERSHIP AND AGAINST GAY RIGHTS."
Newsflash: if the democrats ban a certain firearm or freedom, that loss of freedom effects everyone, including minorities such as homosexuals, for example. These people are the ones with the most dire needs for personal protection. Denying them this right does not seem to be in their interest.
"This isn't fucking rocket science, you've guys have been looking for a way to spin gays in the republican direction"
The republican party is obviously not looking for the support of homosexuals. If they are, they are doing a terrible job of marketing this idea. I would rather gays voted republican than democrat, yes, because I think the 2nd amendment is more important than the right to have a gay marriage - but I support gay rights myself.
The libertarians are a GREAT party, and I suggest voting for them as an alternative to the democratic party. I can't see how anyone, homosexual or not, could vote for a party that would attempt to disarm them, render them completely defenseless and at the mercy of any random gay hater, thug, murderer, rapist, or any other general threat to their well being or property, and take away one of the most essential and natural human rights of all - that of self defense and weapons ownership, all in the name of preserving the right to marry or adopt children... especially as the significant human rights lost apply to everyone - including those minorities willing to sacrifice them in voting for the democratic party. Moreover, without the right to weapons ownership, all the other rights, including those granted from the democrats would be undefendable. Gun rights protect other rights. The fact that the democrats are willing to infringe upon them, not only shows that they are clearly no friend of the minorities or the average man, but is very telling in and of itself.
"and you're doing so at the cultural and social expense of homosexuals!"
And you are trying to drag them in the direction of the democratic party - at the cultural and social expense of everyone, including the minorities in question.
"It's really laughable that you'd continue to debate as if the government is conspiring to disarm gays and gays only."
When people hold a general hate or dislike for a minority, rendering that minority defenseless is the last thing a friend of said minority would do. If you don't believe that, just read up on your history.
"That is NOT the case and that is the ONLY reason a gay man has to ally with a camp of people who hate his/her lifestyle and spits on their ability to raise productive members of society."
I'm a libertarian-conservative, and I don't hate gays, look down upon them, or dislike their lifestyle.
"The next holocaust isn't going to happen the way you think it is. We are not germany, we are not socialists, we don't have the attention span to endure another hitler."
America's attention span is, as you suggest, too short. This makes another holocaust all the more likely to happen. I'm not saying its likely, but gun control is just another part of the big picture that leads to genocide/democide/mass murder by government. The historical link between the two is undeniable.
"Grow up, baby boomer piece of shit."
Yay for personal attacks in political debate!