>>66
"Men shouldn't jump into bed with a woman if he doesn't know her well enough to where he has to ask this question in the first place. Do you understand anything about male/female relationships? Because it doesn't seem like it."
I understand it well enough to know that you're putting ALL responsibility on the male when it's the female who best understands the risks involved. You saound to me like the kind of person who thinks it's in the nature of all guys to be surly and stupid and therefore, everything that does wrong is because of said surly and stupid individual. Well, if that's the case, what does this say about the the inherently genius female who decided to hang out with the idiot male?
"There is proof. You've seen it already, I gather. And this proof, I think, wouldn't change your position. You are an unreasonable person to begin with."
It's easy enough to say that without actually providing proof isn't it? Perhaps you have a whole row of 'lifeless tumor' and 'no heartbeat' rationalizations lined up. If that's your proof, then you're coming up short as usual.
"Finally, Abortion isn't a risk to national security, nor the security of a society. This is something YOU haven't proven."
On the contrary: It is because you haven't proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that fetuses don't live that I have proven that it's a threat to society's stability. Becuase you are so unwilling to care if the fetus lives or not and are simply concerned with getting rid of it, you are shown to be individually objectivist, which is exactly what people like Hitler, Stalin, and Hussein were. They also made "over-population" arguments (ones YOU use but haven't been able to prove).
"Abortion has been around as long as the concept of birth has."
No. The CONCEPT of abortion has been around just as long as the CONCEPT of birth has. Just because the idea exists, that doesn't mean it will be legislated by every culture.