>>57 I trust common sense to deliver the basics via schools, and I don't want to live in a society where people can tell their kids whatever without there being buffers from education. If I am an elightened and sensible parent I think it is fair to demand of others that they teach their children equally well so that my children won't have to fear sexual morons or having to watch their drinks when they are at a party.
>>56 "The relationship between men and women doesn't need to be changed. What are you suggesting? I think birth control is the right answer." I am suggesting a nearly complete rejection of gender roles and the ensuing demands for cosmetical and behavioral conformity.
>>55 "Not to be an ass, so please don't take offense, but it's a very true generalization. Democrats have shown they are very frightened people. They want to ban every other activity based on irrational fears. (Take a look at the debate over firearms ownership if you want an example)." Democrats are too doubtful and regulating, but republicans rely too heavily on naivity towards people. It's as if the don't relize that people are shaped by the environment.
>>58 "Bodies are not property of the state and they should not be subject to the being controlled by the state. Born or unborn." The issue isn't whether it is born or not, since that is largely a physical state (inside/outside). And women are not controlled by the state per se, so that is argument is moot.
Abort more foetuses. As many as women deem neccesary. And then when we've sucked the stem cells out of them, put them in water balloons and throw them at the teary-eyed waste of human components that try to harm the practice. Death death death vacuum vacuum vacuum.