>>469
"The conservatives method is to ruin a systems potential and effectiveness until it has to be stripped altogether (Soc Sec springs to mind)."
And the liberals' method is to ruin the market's potential and effectiveness until it has to be replaced altogether (health care springs to mind.)
"Well, there is this idea that market will take away excess gender profiling. I dunno 'bout that."
Whether it does or it doesn't doesn't matter. Employers have the right to hire or fire whomever they please for whatever reason they please. There's no such thing as a right to a job. Jobs are something given to people by employers, agreed upon by mutual consent, and unless there is some sort of binding contract, can be revoked at ANY time for ANY reason.
"Well, as a moderate libertarian I believe lines can be drawn without Stalin winning."
You said you weren't an advocate of centrism or moderation. Ha. Well, I would rather be consistent, thanks.
"Well since the issue has been reduced to a forced, one-or-the-other utlitarian choice the women win by default."
No, because the right to life is more significant than the right to kill fetuses, again, provided we are talking about your hypothetical example, in which it is all or nothing.
"And men are responsible for accepting her egg."
Men don't accept her egg.. it is the reverse, women are accepting the semen.