Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Abortion and Women's Rights

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 22:10

Abortion has nothing to do with women's rights.  Murder is not a right. 

Name: Kumori 2006-08-29 11:06

"No it isn't.  Just hold people accountable, and punish irresponsibility, while rewarding responsibility.  This will encourage people to be more responsible.  Simple as that, really."

Irrelevant since kids don't know what sex is beforehand.

"No.  Schools should be privatized.  Private schools are far superior as well, and contribute to ending the chain of poverty by giving everyone a superior education."

(Hypothetically since I got myself sterilized.) You pay for my kids going to a expensive private school then.

"Education is a maybe - but we shouldn't neglect the *reason* that we implimented public education - to keep voters informed."

Then the onl subject in public schools would be History, Government and Economics. Massive fail.

"It isn't necessary."

Education isn't necessary? LOL.

"'Spiteful,' says the person who has, for the *second* time, in the *same post* told me to 'get the hell out'? LOL."

I broke down your post if you haven't noticed. LOLIGAGGLES.

"Ah, so its the 'faggots' fault, says she who calls *me* 'spiteful.'"

Yes. Faggots = Those whom want to cut contraceptives and sex-ed while making abortions more scarce. Contradicting bastards. You are spiteful.

"It is not the fault of said 'faggots' for opposing sex-ed."

They think that by keeping people in the dark, they won't do anything. That has been proven wrong many times.

"Actually, the fact that we live in this day and age makes it easier to learn about sex regardless of whether there is, or is not sexual education classes."

It doesn't go for everyone though. Not every one is the same person with the same resources.

"Due to this, as well as many of the advances in technology, and the rise in standard of living, and in public resources, sex-ed is not needed."

It still is in schools if they're not getting what they need to know at home. The stork and cabbage patch stories don't suffice.

"No, last I checked I live in the real world.  By the time they are able to have sex, by the way, they are not children, they will be adolescents, or 'young adults.', whichever you prefer."

That doesn't count for 11-13 year olds. Children these days have been getting into sex at an earlier and earlier age.

"That's not true.  I'm a very compassionate person."

You just wanted parents with diabetes or a similiar health disorder to drop dead instead of raising a family. That's really not compassionate.

"LOL.  Should I list all the spiteful comments you have directed at me in this post? Don't make me laugh... please... hahaha."

I'm not the one telling people with health problems like diabates not to raise a family, now am I? (I guess that can be called selected reproduction. Very fascist.) Also, I'm not the one ditching people who have already established themselves in society (men, women, children) in favor of fetuses. You take offense that I called you spiteful? You really are.

"I have a legitimate opinion regarding politics, and this topic specifically."

Flawed/contradicting opinions don't count.

>>410

Crowd goes wild. *whooosh..ahhhhh*

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List