>>405 Completely disagree with that. If libertarianism means that parents can teach their children whatever, I am not a complete libertarian. Public education and national healthcare are not necessarily evil (the worst word in existance, just in case).
"The point is is that if I knew, they can too. If they don't, its their fault." Gahahahaha!
"Who cares when it starts? It shouldn't start. If you want it, get it with your own money for your kids." The thing is that we would like to take some of your money, not because we believe that it is right but because it would pain you.
"I knew." Yawn.
"You think the only way to learn about sex is through your parents or through your teacher? LOL. My parents never told me shit about sex, and I learned and turned out fine." That could just as well be the exception that confirms the rule. Common sense is nothing compared to positivism.
"Sure. Children aren't as dumb and inept as you think. By the time they are old enough to get pregnant, or even get their hormones pumping so they actually start *wanting* to have sex in the first place, they have already been here long enough and had plenty of opportunities to learn on their own, or ask others questions." Keyword is could. A lack of impossibility doesn't cause certainty.
And your analogy is still sub-par, as is many parts of your country. Worry about them.