>>308 Corporatism is a practice that can be good or bad. Abortions can be good or bad, depending on when the foetus is aborted. When a minority of corporations and a minority of women can't handle the responsibility and the privilege then an outright ban of abortions is exactly like banning corporations because of Pepsi and Coke messing up India. Were it takes place and whose jurisdiction they are under is irrelevant here. A minority of abortions take place when sentience and a state above that of meat has been achieved. Abortions pay off to society, and until a foetus has achieved a human consciousness removing it is nothing more controversial than a woman flushing some accidental semen out of her canal. I can stand firm and there are no immoral ethical implications of my stance, because the alternative is collective punishment, a betrayal of liberty. Human life is nothing without cerebral processing, so removing a foetus is not murder.
>>309 A person refuting a claim of being a right-wing stereotype while misspelling 'stereotype'.
Also, if liberal states need more unfucking than conservative ones, why do they apparently get less money than the tough, sustainable, hard-working, self-determining heartlanders? And why do the anti-statist government hating paranoid redneck politicians gladly gobble money, shouldn't they set an example, i.e. put up or shut up?