Ron Paul's Anti-Tax Bill

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060718-083429-4191r.htm

Ron Paul's (R-TX) bill would attempt to prohibit the funding of the U.N. if the U.N. tried to impose any kind of tax on U.S. citizens.

We should not be funding organizations like these that are opposed to our very constitution and national sovreignty itself.

You can contact your representatives on this information in the following places: 

http://www.house.gov/

http://www.senate.gov/

>>1
I agree.  Why should our tax money be funding those corrupt bureaucrats at the U.N.? That money could be far better spent here at home in the United States. 

>>2 It's not like your presence have been pleasant for them. You harmed hundreds of peace-keeping resolutions and you actually acted on credit considering you only started paying your fee by the time you needed some support before the bumbling invasion of Iraq (once again, I suport overthrowing Afg. and Irq. on principle, I just don't think it should be advertised as a noble war on terror). Luckily, we saw through your worthless attempt at advertising imperialism, unlike a majority of the American populace. You should hold a nation-wide ballot regarding your continued membership, and stick to your own devices. The U.N. acts as a speedbump to your SUV, and we have better things to do.

>>3
The USA is like spiderman, no matter how much good he does the people he does good for still hate him because they are afraid of what they don't understand.

>>4 Uh huh. The US is the world's factory, but the problem is that any attempt to limit the negative side effects are met with hostility and military action. We don't want to turn the factory off, we have just realized that we are going to have kids someday, and we are fucking tired of having to take so much bad with the good for no particular reason other than short-sightedness and selfishness. You are not a good member of the UN. G'wan if you want to.

>>5
>The US is the world's factory

Surely you mean China?

>>6 Well, slowly they may be phasing the US out as far as cheap wares go, but America is still the accountancy department as long as all those dollars are floating around in the world. Things are changing rapidly.

>>7
For the worse since China is overpopulated polluted and despotic and will only exceed USA's economy by not having a minimum wage. Strange how liberals love China when if anything they are less socialsit than even the US.

US should disband UN. It does nothing.

>>8 I think the left hate China in general;  they are becoming fat, they don't care about the environment and they consume for the sake of consumption. Plus their labor laws are draconian and they're not very equal. On the other hand everything that harms American dominance (even though it is looking more and more like an emulated perversion of American polycracy and consumerism at the mo) is A-ok with the left, not to mention that they have a big meaty gov. If I was a state electee I would try to prohibit my olympic team from going to Beijing in '08; it would be a recognition of China as being 'just one of the boys', when it is in fact a smog-ridden, gentrified, hierarchal, girl-killing, dissent-torturing cultureless mess without any conscience in its rapidly growing market. We have to keep them away from India and instead try to help its slightly less inequal and hierarchal sibling to the south. Not to mention hope they all die before they start buying cars.

I remember a time when Europeans thought they were supreme and invaded my country.  Welcome to my world.

>>9
Ultimate CIA plan

Hire some Moslim terrorist to blow up the place when full UN meeting takes place with small-scale nuclear bomb. Ensure that everyone dies. Execute surviving terrorists. Then just let rest of world go against non-existing terrorists screaming furiously and beating shit out of eachother also remember that you have just killed all the dictators.

>>12
Lawl, that would be so fucking awesome. I would approve if my country used that as an excuse to tell all the mudslimes to gb2 their Allah loving crap countries.

>>11 Well, Europe killed its superiority by resting on obsolete methods of diplomacy, national machismo, conspiring interests, short-sighetdness and poor military scope, and we stopped being the center of the world in 1918 because our three biggest empires were ravaged. I'm not sure if America fulfills all the credentials but one has to agree it needs to change pathology if it is to prevent being overrun by its accumulated negative side effects.

>>14
What should the US do? Pay millions of dollars to other countries so their terrorists don't whip themselves into a paranoid frenzy and kill innocents? I don't think that would work. Until every country in the world is as peaceful and democratic as Switzerland, Belgium, Hong Kong and other countries like that we will not stop killing assholes, no matter how fucked in the head you are and desperate you are to suck on their tyrannic salty scrotums.

Oh and compare the oh so poor oppressed nation of south korea to the free anti-imperialist anti-american anti-liberty north korea if you want proof of how much of a dumb fuck you are.

>>14
Indeed.  Internal European strife kept them from invading out of the continent.  You guys should pat yourselves on the back for causing two World Wars.

>>16
And you should pat the allies on the back for defeating the nazis who would have gone on an extermination spree in africa and the middle east? Think about it, you are biting the hand that saved your ass.

Nazis are still European.  What's your point?

We need some new Nazis that kill Arabs instead of recruiting them into SS foreign legions.

>>18
But some europeans are not nazis? You might have noticed. Now start kissing our ass.

>>20
I have noticed that Europeans are very loathsome and unlikable people. Central-europe is filled with retards and Nazis. UK is filled with even more retards, but atleast they make good comedies. Somewhat exception is Northern and Eastern Europe, but same elements exists there too.

>>20
Maybe after you learn the correct usage of the question mark.

You fools, you still think america is so mighty and powerful, you better get used to sucking ass when 30% of your youth is fucking high-school dropouts, your currency loses out completely to the Euro, and the Chinese become the new world hegemon.

Regardless of how "loathsome" and "dirty socialist terrorist sucking" Europeans are, they are going to survive.

America is oblivious to how the world changed, go ahead and bomb and invade countries, it's not as if the terrorists are going to stand up and fight you, they'll fight dirty and America can pat itself on the back for fighting fair...oh wait, you torture and abduct people without charging them of a crime, so much for having a moral authority.

>>22
American English isn't a real language?

FAGGOTS STOP THE AMERICA VS EUROPE BITCHING

IT'S WHITES VS THE FUCKING ARABS VS THE FUCKING CHINKS YOU FAGS

Fuck China and fuck the U.N.

Jesus, this US vs Europe vs China threads reminded me of Diablo after the Sin War....I think I'll need to tell my descendand the secret location of the Heradric Cube...

China is a shithole. 

>>24
Grammar isn't useful?

>>29
American grammar isn't real grammar?

>>30
Adding a question mark to statement that is not a question is correct grammar?

>>28
Yeah really, who the fuck wants to live in China? All you whiney Socialists in the USA should go move to China and quit bitching about Capitalism and Gun Rights here. 

>>31
Believing that your prestige dialect is prescriptive english does not justify your incorrect grammar?

>>33
Using words that you don't understand is correct grammar?

Stinkin U.N.