The nature and extent of our current national crisis, as well as its causes and cures, are the subject of intense political struggle. I offer this letter as a contribution to that struggle and debate in hopes of helping to clean up the country and get it back on course again. I will start this discussion by arguing that it would be grossly premature for Pres. George W. Bush to claim final victory. Then, I will present evidence that Pres. Bush pompously claims that society is supposed to be lenient towards churlish ex-cons. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. Granted, he treats people as objects. But his criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, Pres. Bush's criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in his "I think … I believe … I feel" game. Pres. Bush says that he is beyond reproach. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that no one has a higher opinion of him than I, and I think he's an unscrupulous hacker.
I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Pres. Bush and his deputies, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that Pres. Bush truly believes that going through the motions of working is the same as working. It is just such lousy megalomania, venal egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Pres. Bush to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Maybe he just can't handle harsh reality. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-08 8:24
Hmm, for the first term of his presidency i found him to be a good president and if he had ended it there i probably still would think he wasa a good president. Its the recent immigration debate that drove me away from him (He just loves his illegals so damn much). It really angers me to see that the person leading our nation could be so...how do i say....Reatarded when it comes to this issue. You want to give amnesty to 12 million+ people who violated our law and are hurting our economy and our country in general. And if you do give them amnesty like 50 million more are gonna come. I live in southern california and things are getting pressy shitty down here (they used to be good) in the last 20 years(Wasn't it about 20 years the last amnesty bill was passed?) It makes no sense to me. I have no ideas as to what drives this insanity in his brain (if anyibody has theories please share them)
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-08 11:10
Auto-complaint generator is dichotomilistic!
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-08 11:16
Vicente Fox is President of Mexico. He uses lobbyists to tell senators not to let border patrol get in the way when immigrants cross the border. This allows the drug trade to flourish, especially meth, where ephedrine can easily be manufactured and brought across the border. Workers find better jobs than in the poor Mexican economy, where wealth is held by politicians and drug lords. Since they're willing to work below minimum wage in the US, agriculture and labor industries regularly hire and support them, and they can lobby to pass bills that support their industry and loosen enforcement of anti-immigration laws. This is all possible because the US is a bribocracy.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-11 16:22
If you wanted him out of office that badly why did you put him up against a complete dipshit, asshole like John Kerry. The guy is more of a fucking zombie than Cheyney, and that is really saying something. Can you really look at all the democrat politicans in the nation and say "he would make the best president"? Bush is in power because the other party did a mock election, never intending to win in the first place. why don't you spend your time trying to figure out why this happened?
Name:
Sage Killer2006-06-11 16:31
FUCK BUSH, FUCK SCHWARZENEGGER, FUCK WORLD, FUCK YOU ALL!!!
Politions are motherfucker!!
SAGE IS DEAD - LONG LIVES SAGE KILLER
Name:
:o(2006-06-11 20:16
#5 anonymous, your right, from a now, ex-republican point of view and #1,
from skiming through your statement, your right. He doesn't have Americas best view at heart.
The reasons are very evident, but I will give you a few:
New World order, aka he wants both north and south borders removed, wants same currency, as well as a sort of, minimum wage for all of north america ( his own words)
Also, check out the video when americans president fox, was with bush in chicago about 2 years back. Fox turned to him, infront of the cameras here in america and stated something to the effect of " you will take care of our people". bush responded with a small smile and a slap of friendship on foxes back.
Or I could mention him calling American citizens, vigilantes, for standing guard on the border. Mostly on their private property, watching for illegals. ( a right we have by law and according to the constitution of the united states ??)
Or how about locking closed border republicans out of official republican meetings, according to Indiana's own republican, Hastings, and others,. Only open border republicans can attend.
Is this enough or would you like to hear about his own Republican Governor from Texas, who has stated numerous times, I believe his name is Conly or something to this affect, that they have caught Al-Quedya members coming across the southern borders, but to bush, that don't mean nothing nor does he care.
I am going to stop here, but remember the big picture. One world order, one economy, one political system, one nation, one set of borders, say good by to all that every american has fought for and are fighting for now.
Unfortunately, unless we get out those republican, democrats, liberals, etc.. that are concerned for america, all I have to say is.
GOD BLESS this land, the people, and whatever may come of it.
Or how about
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-11 20:59
>>6
Why don't you say something that somebody cares about. Nobody here ever said that all politicians aren't assholes(although I tend to believe many low-level local politicans have the best of intentions before they get higher in offices). This argument is what all political arguments are about: "Your politican is more of an asshole than mine is". Your position is obvious because the only two politicans you decided to specifically curse were Bush and Shwarzenegger, so argue that position. Bush was simply the best person who's application appeared at the poll when I went, If I had to name the person in the country I thought would do the best it wouldn't be him, but I voted on his application over the other ones handed to me. Schwarzenegger never should have been elected, he ran on bullshit holywood credit and had no qualifications to be a politician. However in many(not all) cases he did a respectable job on important decisions(unlike the gay marriage thing where he just hid under his desk). If you don't like him vote for someone else next year and be glad that he can't become president.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-11 21:37
>>8
So you buy that Republican scare tactic: "If you don't vote for us, you'll get *"? You voted for someone you knew to be ill qualified to do the job? Then democracy fails.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-11 23:41
Bush was simply the best person who's application appeared at the poll when I went
God help us all.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-12 0:57
"So you buy that Republican scare tactic: "If you don't vote for us, you'll get *"? You voted for someone you knew to be ill qualified to do the job? Then democracy fails."
I don't think that tactic is limmited to republicans - democrats use it as well. If one liberal decides he is going to vote for Nader, deciding Kerry just doesn't do it for him, another would say, "well if you don't vote for kerry you'll get *bush*."
On a side note, if Bush was the -best- application passed to you, maybe the solution would be to have more applications passed to you?
If more 3rd party candidates had a shot at the office, and it wasn't dominated by two parties, you would have more applications to choose from.
>>9
Scare tactic, "If you don't vote for us, you'll get *"? Are you really saying Kerry didn't use that tactic? would anyone have ever voted for kerry if the person he had been running against haddn't been bush? That was 50% of his fucking platform. the other being about 10% "free" healthcare, and 40% "when I was in vietnam". He was a bullshit candidate that ran on not being bush and the scare tactic of what would happen if bush won the election. and you have to balls to call the strategy "Republican scare tactic[s]" that is complete hipocritical bullshit. At least i have the honesty to point out that Bush isn't the best person for the job, just the best available option.
>>11
I am at odds with instant runoff voting, as it has it's drawbacks, and I am not personally decided on the issue. However as long as it remains a two party system neither party is interested in the extra competition that comes from instant runnoff so i doubt I will ever really have to worry about it.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-14 3:04
>>13 is right it was definitly a case of the lesser of two evils.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-14 10:27
That's a terrifying "lesser of two evils" you have there.
The only people who don't believe that GWB is a walking disaster are the ones subject to America's media. All the news services over there give me a headache, they're so bad; a brilliant display of emergent social control.
Even the liberal green party of wisconsin has negative things to say about you lousy dems. Way to go. I could go on and on posting about how corrupt and shitty the democrats have proven to be, but no need.
"Don't waste your vote on some third party douche whose going to lose anyways; fix the system you have:"
Wake up dumbass, the democrats aren't fixing shit. The reason you vote libertarian is because neither the republicans nor the democrats accurately represent you.
The libertarian party is for people tired of COMPROMISING on freedom. They want all their civil liberties, including 2nd amendment rights. They want less taxes, and a smaller, more wise, and frugal government.
The agenda of the Democrats is almost indistinguishable from Bush's anyways. They are both for big-government. The democrats are for taxation, and big spending. The CURRENT republicans are for less taxation, and high spending. Of course, that's irresponsible. But it's not as irresponsible as spending other people's money against their will-which the democrats are for. (Foreign aid? Welfare? You name it..)
Look at that shithead John Kerry. The northeastern liberal trying frantically to act like he wouldn't take away everyone's firearms... bullshit. The republicans knew he would, just like they knew gun-hating Gore would, and that likely has quite a bit to do with why neither of them got elected.
Surveys show at least half of all households have at least one gun owner. I think it's pretty safe to say that with so many firearms owners in the U.S., many of which are disproportionately likely to vote republican instead of democrat, the democrats might have won the last couple elections if they had a better track record on the 2nd amendment.
Some people are tired of compromising traditional american values like free speech, and 2nd amendment rights in exchange for privacy rights granted them by elitist welfare-statist democraps. For those people tired of compromising, there is the Libertarian party.
Face it, Kerry was just Bush-lite. During his campaign, he failed to offer the public much more than "hey, look at me, I'm not as bad as him!"
Until the democrats return to their Jeffersonian roots, they've lost my vote. Not to mention all your stuipd democrats' bullshit taxes, and support of ridiculous spending projects, even in light of the looming budget crisis:
>>17
I am a liberitarian and I agree that Liberitarians are not corrupt. however if you put them into power you could get the same thing as either of the two major parties.
"power corrupts and absolute power is kind of fun....I mean corrupts absolutely"
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-15 0:17
>>18
Whether or not are they psychopats or criminals. I couldn't care less. Point is that they're not gonna create banland police state ever.
Yes, but if we had multiple political parties to choose from, along with IRV, it's likely things would be less corrupt, and that 3rd parties and pro-freedom groups would have more of a say. I think the end result from a departure from the two party system would be great. More competition among the parties on the issues...
It would stop this bullshit where the dems/repubs are looking like two sides of the same coin. (Probly part of the inevitable result of the two party system).
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-15 14:40
Democrats suck.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-15 14:49
I like how this organization just closed down during Bush's term. I guess real accountability was only needed during the Clinton years. After that, well, who cares?
I think that more or less does it, unless anyone has any others to add.
Name:
SHEPPARD BILL2006-06-17 20:58
#11 you are right. I personally have changed my 20 + year republican party to independent. I am not really worried about how or which group would win, I would like to see americans through out both parties.
Then I would party over the elections.
Again, please vote anyone except DEM/LIBeral or Republican.
WOULDN'T IT BE INTERESTING TO SEE THE OUTCOME OF THOSE IN POWER, THAT WORK FOR US? THINK ABOUT IT. :O)
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-17 23:51
>>30
But above all, what will break up the two-party system is IRV. Support IRV. IRV is what will really give 3rd parties some influence. Again, just in case anyone missed it:
Some states, like Vermont are very close to having it. Some counties already do, unless I'm horribly mistaken.
www.fairvote.org talks about IRV and supports it I think, but last I checked their site is down. May want to check back in a while if you are interested.
White people don't have any influence right now because white people are disorganized while all of the other races are. As such, they fight for their own individual good. Once white people become a minority, without any organization and being at the mercy of other majorities, they will be simply crushed by the desires of other groups wanting things that conflict with the new white minority. The new white minority still won't want to be 'racist' whilte La Raza and all the other racial organizations from the Jewish ones to the Black ones happily keep on fighting for their own interests and protection. As such, White people will get shafted. Actually, if current trends continue, no one with be part of the white population group (as they have been either squashed out of existance) anymore while the Asian, Black, Jewish, etc. still will be going strong. If I remember correctly, another facet of this trend is that White people (always a world minority) have got from being 10% of the world population to 6% (if my memory serves correctly.) That's the very definition of genocide. Oh, and non-Whites couldn't care a flip that everything points to us going extinct within a number of centuries. Sorry, no good semaritans are going to fight for our right to exist. Nobody is going to help us.
That is, unless White people don't start getting their act together, and soon, and help themselves.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-18 1:00
Vote for Ron Paul (R-TX)!
Libertarian-republican, who is principled and will support the bill of rights & constitution.
Name:
Anonymous2006-06-20 23:07
>>31
Yes but not all republicans are bad... the RLC (Republican Liberty Caucus) is a largely libertarian organization. They are worthy of praise... especially, as >>34 mentioned, Ron Paul, who was the organization's chair or whatever for a while.
>>31
Yes but not all republicans are bad... the RLC (Republican Liberty Caucus) is a largely libertarian organization. They are worthy of praise... especially, as >>34 mentioned, Ron Paul, who was the organization's chair or whatever for a while.
>>19 I need a reaction to this. It's interesting: http://www.eriposte.com/economy/other/demovsrep.htm I don't want to provoke or discredit or attack. I'm not implying anything. I want an honest, intelligent reaction or absolutely nothing. Just take a look. My intention is only to gain some input.