Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

About some old bashing

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 18:48

I want to talk about relationship between France and USA.
I'm french, and even if people of my country don't like the way of thinking of America, we respect it.

So, why, when I go on 4 chan and I see a topic about a french subject, I read always France bashing.

France, a normal country in a normal world, is so hated in America ? Why ? Our history is full of friendship!

Think of Lafayette for example

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 18:59 (sage)

It's a meme, okay.

I'm french, and even if people of my country don't like the way of thinking of America, we respect it.

I'd go batshit insane if anyone disrespected my country.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 19:07

I hate france.  I hate that they want to have complete control over the EU, i hate that they don't even realize the consessions that England is making for them.  I hate that they spew morality about us going to war to cover up them making a fortune on the oil for food program.  I hate that thoughout history we have to pull their asses out of the fire.  I hate that we named french fries after them for some reason.  I hate people that think they should be renamed(french fries not the french).  I hate that we are actually supposed to idolize the german and french economies with their astronomical minimum wage, socialist progression, and "free" healthcare.  I hate that their name keeps on comming up at all in the news when they mean absolutely nothing any more.  I hate that they stoped the UN from taking any action with the US in iraq using thier veto power.  Do i really need any more reason to hate them than that.  I am sick of not being able to say what i want about them without being called a warmonger, conservative, fruitcake.  I am sick of the fact that i am actually supposed to care what france thinks about us, and that france cares about what i think about them.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 19:19

Wow, a post full of will for understand the problem

And about war (Why is this subject is always in the debate...?), don't you think about another way to make peace ? And everybody knows the war was just for oil.
So, the US fights for his interests too no ? France do the same, England do the same. Everyone use the veto in UN.

And believe me, but socialist progression isn't the best solution but it's really satisfying to know we don't have to pay or very few for see a doctor

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 19:33

I'm American and I don't really have any problems with France.  I even studied the language for 4 years.  And I think French women are pretty damn hot. (much love for Alizée)

But, to the OP, you have to understand that this is just 4chan.  Everyone here is anonymous and so people say outragous things just for the hell of it.  They don't have any real targets for their frustrations, so they take it out on an easy target, in this case France.
So, my friend I'm sorry that people are saying offensive things about your country.  But hey, this is just 4chan and most of the people here are pretty stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 19:42

I was talking with a friend about that and he thinks exactly like you. Le forum de l'élite!
I feel a little better, we're not the only one who thinks that

Merci américain anonyme ;)

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 20:06 (sage)

>>1-6
gb2/http://dis.4chan.org/read.php/lang/1140506506/

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 20:07

>>2
Haha, cry more stupid vegetarian.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 20:27

A HISTORY FULL OF FRIENDSHIP.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 22:30

If the war is for oil i want to know where the fuck it is.  I mean if we are over there fighting for oil, we have the country now, just take the shit.  why is the price going to high on it.  the war for oil thing is bullshit.  We aren't going to steal all of iraq's oil from them.  if we were we would have already.  I really do get fucking tired of france, and let me reiderate why:


>>3

       "I hate france.  I hate that they want to have complete control over the EU, i hate that they don't even realize the consessions that England is making for them.  I hate that they spew morality about us going to war to cover up them making a fortune on the oil for food program.  I hate that thoughout history we have to pull their asses out of the fire.  I hate that we named french fries after them for some reason.  I hate people that think they should be renamed(french fries not the french).  I hate that we are actually supposed to idolize the german and french economies with their astronomical minimum wage, socialist progression, and "free" healthcare.  I hate that their name keeps on comming up at all in the news when they mean absolutely nothing any more.  I hate that they stoped the UN from taking any action with the US in iraq using thier veto power.  Do i really need any more reason to hate them than that.  I am sick of not being able to say what i want about them without being called a warmonger, conservative, fruitcake.  I am sick of the fact that i am actually supposed to care what france thinks about us, and that france cares about what i think about them."

          That covers it all. and most of it is not about the war at all, stop just reading the stuff that justifies your existance and read the whole paragraph.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 0:30

France has the French Foreign Legion, they're constantly at war in at least one part of the world. Sissy french - does not compute!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 0:56

Yeah it did fucknuts. My friends grandpa was a victim and saw a lot of the shit happen. He often tells my friend stories about it. Oh yeah, I guess he must be a robot alien created by the US government to spread lies.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 0:57

>>12

I'M TELLIN YOU. THE PIZZA BALLS ARE DELISH.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 1:12

I never said all french were sissies throughout history, although i did mention that we have done a lot of pulling them out of the fire this past century, and that the modern french ideology and government is somewhat cowardly and nonconfrontational when it matters.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 1:57

>>14
No, they're just being french, nonconformists and "rebellious" when you least want them to be

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 2:58

no, so you are saying the french are going against the rest of the world by being cowardly and nonconfronational,  that is nice to know, but it still makes them cowardly and nonconfronational.  Being a rebel is fine if you have something to bebel again.  being nonconformist is fine if you know what conformity you arg against.  being just a diehard nonconformist rebel is just pointless and stupid because it means you will just go against what the estableshment is for because they are the establishment.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 3:44

we have the country now, just take the shit

Just one problem: the ragheads keep destroying the infrastructure. How are you supposed to take oil when the pipelines are br0ke?

Why the fuck do you think oil prices are so high?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 3:47

>>16
Yes, because the country of France is just a personification of a 16 year old punk on the street? Why are you so useless? Stop posting here.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 3:54

People who think the war is the sole cause for high oil prices are fucking retarded.
NEWS FLASH:
China and India are both huge nations that are buying up a shit ton of oil in order to fuel their growing industries.
And what does it mean when a ton of people all want and need the same thing?  THE FUCKING PRICE GOES UP!!!
Stupid faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 3:56

>>14
Yeah, because it's so easy to be a hero when you have another country and especially a channel between you and the German blitzkrieg.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 3:57

>>19
Yeah, because that sudden huge price spike was caused by a sudden huge increase in demand by China and India.

You're the idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 4:41

>>21
The price didn't spike up over night.  Five years ago gas was about .90/gallon.  Now, it's about 2.90-3.20 depending where you are.  Yeah, that's high, but it didn't happen out of nowhere.  But I guess you really only started to pay attention when the fucking media blitzed the shit out of it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 4:51

LOL IM FRENCH AND IT WASNT MY CHOICE BUT I WILL DEFEND MY COUNTRY EVEN THOUGH I LIVE IN CANADA OR SOMETHING CAUSE I NEED TO ADD SOME IMPORTANCE TO MY LIFE

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 5:11

>>22
The gas prices started to seriously leap at the beginning of 2002. At that time the price was about $1.50. At the end of 1985 the price was... about $1.50. What where we doing at the beginning of 2002? Romping through the Middle East.

NOPE, THEY'RE NOT RELATED AT ALL GUYZ. NOT AT ALL. IT'S BIGGER THAN THE SPIKE CAUSED BY THE IRAQ-IRAN WAR OR OPEC OIL EMBARGO, BUT IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS! NOOOOOO!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 5:30

No one said it has nothing to do with oil prices.  BUT IT'S NOT THE ONLY FUCKING REASON!!!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 5:35

Yeah, Israel is the other.

Other that oil and allies, what reason is there to go to that desert? WMD and "freedom" are nothing but carrots for public opinion.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 5:50

actually the gas prices started rising 9-12-2001.  what was thw sunificance of that day?  it was just using an excuse to raise the prices to make more money.  the oil companies are using the same thing today.  the price of oil hasn't actualy increased 30% in the pas year, just our willingness to pay an extra 30%

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 17:25

The whole Americans hating the French issue stemmed from the Reagan years, when France, for one reason or another, didn't allow the U.S. military to use French airspace to fly to Libya and bomb targets there.

As expected with Reagan supporters and republicans in general, they forgot (or never knew anything) about past history and now believe that France has done nothing for America, ever, either in regards to culture or in regards to military support (like in the Revolutionary War).

And because of that, all "patriotic" Americans need to "fight for freedom" by making jokes about how the French smell and surrender, and call French fries (which despite the name, aren't even French, and based on the high cholesterol and deep fried nature, are probably actually American in origin) "freedom fries."

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 17:37

>>28 french fires are from beligium dumbass

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 17:52

>>29
i'm sure the argument is total bullshit, based on their mistake about the origin of a fast food item.  somehow, you know this, yet you don't know how to spell belgium or fries for that matter?  you sure know your fast food.  it reminds me of that huge woman/man from deuce bigalow who played the food trivia game.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 18:29

    yeah, yeah the french took a hard hit from germany in WWII, and i guess they made a good shield for england against germany.  How about this.  The only reason that france got taken over in the first place is because of the complete incompetence of the French army.  The only reason that the British forces were able to escape back to britan from Dunkirk is because hitler thoought it was going to easy.  He thought even the french couldn't be that stupid as to loose so fast, he was wrong.  And the whole thing wouldn't have happened int he first place if Britian and France acted forcefully when hitler took over the entire eastern portion of Europe.  Or at least stood with poland, their fucking ally, when they were invaded.
>>28
      Do you know why France helped us in the revolutionary war, you really think it was from a great love for us.  you are wrong.  They were assisting just to spite Britan, and in the hopes of doing a grab afterwards of the the territory we earned ourselves in that little conflict.  We would have likely won with or without france.  It would have been harder, longer and bloodier, with us being much weaker at the end.  But we are Americans and would have survived.
       France didn't oppose us going into Iraq on any moral high ground.  they opposed it because they didn't want anyone finding out about the oil for food scandel.  And they stoped us from getting any assistance from the UN at all.  all the council members of the UN have veto power over any action the UN does.  France said they would veto it even if it passed unanimously by the rest of the nations in the UN.
      It is all right to be patriotic.  There is noting wrong with patriotism.  I expect the french to be patriotic about their nation as well.  and you are right that the whole "freedom fries" thing was a pointless publicity stunt.  but it's over and you need to get over it. 

>>26
     Isreal is actually a good reason for the middle east to hate america.  We shouldn't have taken their land away and given it to another people.  It wasn't the right action no matter if our intentions were good or not.  But this is also a reason to hate france.  France, Britan, the United States, we all made that mistake together, but who gets all the blame, who is the only one left supporting the decision we made 60 years ago and pretty much have to follow though with now.  WE ARE.  It's all America's Fault. 

>>22
   I must have been asleep that year.  you say in 2001 the gas price was $.90/gal.  What fucking gas staion were you going to.  It hasn't been $.90/gal since the early '80s if not the late '70s.

>>EVERYONE if we are fighting for oil i would sure as hell like to know where it is.  We have been occupying the damned country for the past 3 years now i think, where the fuck is the goddamned oil you kept on promising us when we went in.  You Candyasses told us the war was about oil back then.  or at least some of you did.  You keep on telling us it is about oil.  If we are going to fight a war for oil, fine, but i want the fuking oil if so....So, Where the fuck is it.  you thing George is keeping it in his back pocket or something?
 
>>27
  There is no conspiracy to get oil here.  I am not saying that George didn't have it out for Sudam.  He may well have.  But The world is better off with him out of power.  We now need to get rid of Castro and a few other relics of the Cold War and we will  be generally in a better world.  WMD's were a valid as far as our intelligence network could find.  Our intelligence network was faulty.  It was the same intelligence network that failed to spot 9-11 before it happened.  The same intellignece network that was stripped by Bill Clinton in order to make room for more of his social programs.
     As for "freedom".  They are now free, but they need to fight to keep it themselves.  We need to go back to to a forign policy that is a cross between Truman's policy, and Teddy Roosevelts "Big Stick" policy.  We need to carry that big stick and use it when we need to.  But afterwards we need to equip the locals to fight for their own freedom.  No well free capitalist nation really has any hatered for us, or at least they don't disagree with us to the point of attacking us.
       We need to stop trying to be both everyones friend, and start being a supportive role for other nations.  We became the World's Police force After WWII because we had to.  That period of time is over, but our growth in that roll made it so we can't just retire from our role, I understand that.  But we can't both police the world and be it's friend.  Sometimes you have to knock heads together to police, and those you do it to don't like you much afterwards.


>>28
        Just to piss you off, Regan was one of the best presidents in our nations history, he accomplished much, much more good than he caused bad for the nation. 
    Best Presidents of All time:
George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
Alexander Hamilton
Apraham Lincoln
Theodore Roosevelt
Harry S. Truman
Ronald Regan

 and I am missing alot of earlier presidents from my list because i simply can't attach every one of them to something specific, or at least stopping something specific.

     Those that are iffy because they did Many things very Admirably, and Screwed up other things royally
            Franklin D. Roosevelt--brought about many necessary social changes, took things too far and caused to depression to last much longer than it needed to.  Did very well in WWII.  so he is a close one.

     Presidents that get a bad rap for being worse for the country than they really were:
         Richard Nixon(yes the guy was a dishonest little prick.  at least he resigned instead of really dragging the nation through the mud with the whole impeachment thing.  Actually i wish Clinton had resined and Gore Pardoned him.  Good thing for presidents to do instead of dragging the US though the whole process)
           Hoover--saying the depression was all his fault was really way to much to place on him.  It was the system that he took over.  And he did an admirable job of trying to stabilize it when it did happen.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 22:33

>>31
The only reason that france got taken over in the first place is because of the complete incompetence of the French army.

A couple of points:
* First, they were facing blitzkrieg. This was a new type of warfare not seen before, and a radical departure from what was expected.

* Second, the British were solidly fucked by the Germans in this offensive too. The British Expeditionary Force was right there along with the French near Belgium. This was a joint endeavour, so the British had a major hand in planning.

Sorry, mate, you were caught with your pants down. While historically English have been better fighters than French, if you had been in France's shoes, you'd have been just as solidly fucked. The only thing that saved you was the channel, and eventually Germany turning on the USSR.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 0:32

>>31
All so called "help" is motivated by personal gain, it is implied.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 0:41

>>32
       Who is me cought with my pants down.  As far as i know i wasn't bory until 40 years after the war was over.  And even if i was alive then, I am an american so i didn't get caught with my pants down until Japan attacked Pearl 2 years latter.
       Yes you were facing the Blitzkrieg, a new tactic hitler was using, for the PAST 5 YEARS.  Number two the French forces could have easily defeated Germany if they acted when they should have.  Even when Hitler Invaded it was a fairly farfetched scheme to win.  and should have been pushed back if your commanders had acted with competence.  French and British forces were in Belgum not near it.  The Incompetance was so clear to british forces that they actually just let you run off on your own continuing northward like the dumbasses that you were and got ready to cross the channel at Dunkirk.  France should have seen the attack comming when they saw the rest of europe fall to Germany.  And really should have seen that germany wasn't stupid enough to try to go through the Magino(spelling wrong) line but would go around it.  Following the almost exact path they used in WWI.  Latter in the war you acted bravely and honorably with great competince.  but this failing almost brought about the fall of britan as well as france in a period of two months.  That is the mother of all fuckups.
    The lack of combined action against germany early was both the fault of France and Britan, true.  And America probably should have gotten more involved sooner, but we had FDR as president, and he wan't going to take any action like that.  He was to busy trying to socialize all of america.  And all of us were trying to stay out of a second world war.  The problem is if germany had been treated appropiratly in the first place it we could have avoided the war altogether.  Once again everyones fault.  That does not mean that France didn't act completly incompetiently when the war came to them.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 0:44

>>32,  I am sorry but how can you read all of >>31 and assume i am English.  I mean i never said i was any nationality, but me being american should have been obvious to anyone.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 0:50

>>34
Who is me cought with my pants down.

"You" was collectively the British. If you're not British, then change it to "they".

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 0:52

Whoops, >>36 was directed at >>35. As for >>34:
Yes you were facing the Blitzkrieg

I'm Australian, idiot.

for the PAST 5 YEARS.

Oh? Where?

and should have been pushed back if your commanders had acted with competence.

The British were there too, remember? In the wrong place, along with the French. And they got the shit beaten out of them as well.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 4:09

>>31 Isreal is actually a good reason for the middle east to hate america.  We shouldn't have taken their land away and given it to another people.  It wasn't the right action no matter if our intentions were good or not.  But this is also a reason to hate france.  France, Britan, the United States, we all made that mistake together, but who gets all the blame, who is the only one left supporting the decision we made 60 years ago and pretty much have to follow though with now.  WE ARE.  It's all America's Fault.

Im sorry but your wrong. it wasn't the palestinians land or the arabs land it was the brits to do what they wanted with it. and before them it was the ottomans whom the arabs disliked as well. Historicaly the palestinians have been marauders who never settled into one place. Also if you really want to go into whose land it really was, Historically the jews had it thousands of years before the arabs, so if anyone has an argrument for stolen land its the jews. And the entire palestinian situation is not Americas fault its every other arab nation in the region for refusing to accept their palestinian "brethren" into their land. Why? because they know that if the palestinians have homes and arent displaced then they wont cause as much trouble. So shut up or GTFO!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 4:11

>>32
hmm, yes they did get kinda fucked but take for example the small greek island of creat. It took the germans longer to take small towns on that island than all of france. there was no regular army, just villagers and militia.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 4:43

crete*

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 4:45

I must disagree.

A few things: Mussolini gave the Greeks both time to organise and gain experience. Furthermore, just like England, it's surrounded by a body of water, which the British Navy took advantage of.

And lastly, four Greek battalions, and at least 25,000 English, Aussies and Kiwis are not a militia.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 5:24

ahem, i was referring not to the island itself but a specific town

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 5:55

Urban warfare has always been ugly.

I suppose if the French had really stuck to their guns in town, it could have presented the Nazis with a problem. At that time nobody was carpet bombing.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 5:57

>>39
Comparing any military to the french military is like comparing risotta cheese with the argentinian weaving industry.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 7:43

Ok, this thread is tl;dr, but all I want to say is that France is superior to other European countries. It is the best country in Europe and one of the best countries in the world (along with USA and Japan).

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 8:15

Haha, I remember the U.S surrendering to Vietnam. And they have the tenacity to call the French cowards.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 8:33

The US certainly gave it a good try though.

Face it, conventional doctrine is little good against guerillias, as has been proven over and over again. It's a war for minds.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 9:34

THE FRENCH AND SWEDISH THOUGHT THE NAZIS WOULD CONQUER THE WORLD SO THEY CAPITULATED, NOW THEY LIVE IN FREEDOM AS A DEMOCRACY DUE TO THE SACRIFICE OF AMERICAN LIVES AT NORMANDY.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 10:51

Moar liek Soviet lives, amirite?

Just kidding.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 11:13 (sage)

america sucks, lol

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 12:45

>>50
Fail for saging a post that is at the top of the list.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 13:42 (sage)

>>51
Fail for such a stupid comment. So what?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 14:06

>>46
        "Haha, I remember the U.S surrendering to Vietnam. And they have the tenacity to call the French cowards."
     That is hardly a comparitive argument.  For starters We were fighting in Vietnam, Not the United States.  If the US were getting invaded and We surrendered with little fight. fine OK.  Vietnam was a war that was mismanaged by our side, just like WWII was with the french, fine.  We didn't actually surrendered, because surrendering means you say to the other pary of a war "i's over, we are beat into submission, our nation is open to you".  We simply pulled our support from South Vietnam, which really wasn't that great of a nation anyways.  Also it is directly opposing our foreign policy at the time in the fact that we weren't supposed to put 0ur troops into places like that, we were simply supposed to be arming the natives of that area.  Kennedy got us in there and changed it causing the problem, Johnson saw it escaltae, Nixon didn't really see a way to get out at first, and ran again on the platform of getting us out in six months.  And he actually did it.  This is in the same way that if Kerry were elected in 2004 and pulled us out of iraq, we wouldn't be surrendering to iraq, we would simply be pulling our support from the govenment we placed there.  Not surrendering and opening our nation to Iraq the way france did to germany. 

>>48
        The French army failed in those first months.  The french preserved and acted bravely for their nation afterwards.  French lost more lives in the against germany.  If anyone bought the the defeat of germany in blood it was the Russians.  This is because Stalin used traditional Russian tactics of war of simply sending so many human meatwalls towards the enemy that they eventually run out of bullets, and are overwealmed.

>>47
          WE DIDN'T give it a god try.  the war was mismanaged and we told are troops to hold the line against an enemy that didn't use lines.  We changed our methods lightly to compensate, but overall we failed to really try to win the war, and focused on holding north Vietnam off.  We could have simply taken out Ho Chi Min and put into place a new govenment and it would have turned out better.  We tried it again in Korea, but it was different as we had more extensive treaties with korea regarding their protection.  And lets not kid ourselves.  The Korean war was Really the China-American war.

>>38
       Yes the Jews had it THOUSANDS of years before.  There was not a generation of jews that remembered the generation of jews that held Isreal.  Next yes it was british land to begin with and thier gift to the jews, and the land was still partly from palastine and partly from Jordan.  Yes, They were all nomadic desert people, however that land wasn't, being near water and having good resorces it could be constanly maintained.  Also look at it like this:  They looked at the sprawling dessert of the middle east and gave one of the largest oasises around to someone not from there.  There is obviously a little argument from that. 
    There is a generation of palistinians that remember having posession of isreal.  that remember living in THEIR city.  that remember the history of them controling it for a thousand years previously.  The Jews lost it to history in a war with the Palistinians.  The palisinians lost it to someone not from that but from it simply being given to someone else.  They were ruled fairly loosly by the british,  they did not expect to wake up one moring and read in the newpaper "your nation now belongs to the jews, it is time for you to move".  I mean really would you put up with that shit?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-08 1:59

>>26
Britain gave the land to the Jews in the Balfour Declaration, and they had owned that entire area of the Middle East, but then again, that was awfully mean of the Brits to Subjugate other peoples for imperialistic endevours.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-08 2:52 (sage)

Hooray for generalization, steriotyping and acusations at the drop of a hat!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-08 3:18

>>53   Yes the Jews had it THOUSANDS of years before.  There was not a generation of jews that remembered the generation of jews that held Isreal.  Next yes it was british land to begin with and thier gift to the jews, and the land was still partly from palastine and partly from Jordan.  Yes, They were all nomadic desert people, however that land wasn't, being near water and having good resorces it could be constanly maintained.  Also look at it like this:  They looked at the sprawling dessert of the middle east and gave one of the largest oasises around to someone not from there.  There is obviously a little argument from that.
    There is a generation of palistinians that remember having posession of isreal.  that remember living in THEIR city.  that remember the history of them controling it for a thousand years previously.  The Jews lost it to history in a war with the Palistinians.  The palisinians lost it to someone not from that but from it simply being given to someone else.  They were ruled fairly loosly by the british,  they did not expect to wake up one moring and read in the newpaper "your nation now belongs to the jews, it is time for you to move".  I mean really would you put up with that shit?

yes and after the british gave it to the jews the arabs started a war in which israel severly fucked them up. so by your statement "The Jews lost it to history in a war with the Palistinians" then wouldnt the first arab israeli war have solidified possession of the land by the jews, thus making it a non issue?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-08 9:04 (sage)

How did this thread go from gay French men to the Jewish masterplan of world conquest?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-08 18:09

My point was that Isreal was somthing that British, French and American governments started, enforced and backed, and America is the one that gets all the blame for the middle east conflicts resulting and France and Britan both pulled out.  Now this was because both France and Britan both had much more pressing domestic problems resulting from WWII which hit them much closer to home than it did the US, requiring America fit more and more of the bill.  This happened coutless other times thoughout the cold war.  With British and french financing falling back and requesting the US to take over funding the Anti-Solviet forces in various areas.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-10 20:06

lol, I drive a Bicycle.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-10 20:18

>>58
Ah, I can explain that.

The reason amerika gets the blame is because they stopped the Lord, Hitler from his Glorious plan of World Domination and Jew Extermination.

If they had allowed him to go on about his stuff, the world would have been a much better place!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-14 22:36

>>46
Most americans don't seem to know about that.  Not nowadays anyway...they think we haven't lost a war.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-14 23:55

>>60
    Seriously what is the point of spelling "america" "amerika", what do you gain.  I understand if you are stupid and trying to call it "amerikka" for dramatic effect, but really, wtf is with spelling it "amerika"

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-15 0:23

you spell it amerika if your stupid and british and want to set yourself apart from the rest of the 4 chan herd, and you spell it america if you have any common sense

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-15 14:33

http://www.uaca.ac.cr/acta/1998nov/lreed.htm

The great depression was the result of the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, and the shitty monetary policy we had resulting from that.  If we kept to our more or less laissez-faire style economy of the previous century, we'd be way better off now. 

This isn't the only website to explain this, seriously.  You people need to read more.  Hoover didn't cause the great depression, he inherited it.  With the Federal Reserve there, and the monetary policy like it was, the economy was bound to tank eventually anyway.  Hoover just inherited it, likely. 

Theodore Roosevelt was a statist.  Social security is nothing more than a bankrupt pyramid scheme. 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-24-retiree-taxpayers_x.htm

We would do good to revert to the policies we had before the Federal Reserve.  They encouraged production, trade, business, and everything that created the industrial revolution, and the standard of living we enjoy today.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-15 14:36


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List