>>96
We've already been through this, whites aren't more or less immoral, it's just that they are better at everything they do. I don't think whites are more moral, to begin with, but as their civilisation grew and learned they began to generate new ideas of morality and become more moral, though the large scale effects of this only occurred recently. Civil rights are dependant on democracy and liberty. Would Nazi Germany have permitted civil rights? Would China have ever seen liberty if whites weren't around? Which is worse?
Since China would never even touch liberty and the nazis would at least have the concept of liberty, this means they were closer to achieving it (if it isn't even a possibility, how can you be close to achieving it in the first place? the nazis were more libertarian than the chinese) and thus China is more evil than the nazis.
So the best form of govenrment is a white or northern mongoloid majority democracy which allows immigration and emmigration, but only from the best and brightest from across the globe and the forced emmigration of all criminals. The best form of world rule would see a eugenics program that would humanely see the extinction of inferior races (contraception), to create places for lower populations of people selected for being free from genetic disease and having at least an acceptable level of intelligence.