Iran enriching Uranium.

http//news.yahoo.com/...

Why isn't Bush doing anything. He attacked Iraq with less evidence and while the UN inspectors were given access. Now Iran has blocked the inspections and the leader has claimed to have enriched uranium. And he called Kerry a flip flopper.

lol guess where civilization started. certainely not in Africa.

>>77

In America whiteness/blackness go hand-in-hand with richness/poorness. The only reason "A majority of the poor are white" is because whites make up the majority in America. Anti-Abortion laws aid you keeping those honkey numbers up. Too bad everyone with sense sees through this tactic and Abortion in the areas of the country where all the politicans, intellecuals come from will remain a matter of choice.

Furthering my point- how is it you don't see that a majority of blacks are impoverished. It's only been 50 years, do you expect overnight change from a race of people who have been systematically held back? How can even deny Jim Crow? How can you deny the striization of blacks whom scored higher than whites on IQ tests in the 1940's? How can you deny these things have had an effect on the population and expect to reconcile the white/black race issues in this country.

You're either a fucking fool or you simply are a white supremacist. There can be no other option. You're either wholly ignorant or a bigot. 

Case in point: The only reason anti-racism seems insane to you is because you perceive America as a "white country". A system of racism is benefitial to you (whites) and no one else. That's why you're cnoservative. That's why you're the status quo. That's why you're "business as usual".

American isn't a white country. And that will be shown to be the truth in the next 80-90 years. You're going to eventually have to deal with this undeniable fact before it deals with you (harsely).

You keep saying that the world doesn't revolve around you and yet...your superiority complex, arrogance and fear from losing some advantage you think you have over others still persists.

Why is this?

"whiteness/blackness go hand-in-hand with richness/poorness"
"how is it you don't see that a majority of blacks are impoverished"

After thinking, for so many years, that more Blacks live in poverty than any other racial group, I decided to check the facts for myself. Being inundated with pictures of little starving Black children in the media, you come to accept the "obvious fact" that, because there are more starving Blacks on television, there are more starving Blacks in the real world.

In 2004, based on the Census' People and Families in Poverty by Selected Characteristics: 2003 and 2004, there was a total of 36, 997,000 people living below the poverty line. The population estimates as of July 1st, 2004 showed a total American population of 293,656,842 persons, so about 12.5% of the population is below the poverty line. The 2004 American Community Survey shows a total of 285,691.501. The Census poverty document states 12.7%. Thirty-seven million people is a lot of people; about as much as the entire state of California. (ILLUSTRATION: A White woman from impoverished Appalachia. Greatness can come from the White poor who are not poor genetically; think of Poe. The same cannot be said for the non-White underclass that absorbs so much of our tax money today.)

We'll use the Community Survey numbers:

Total Population by Race

Whites - 216,036,244, 75.6%
Blacks - 34,772,381, 12.2%
Asian - 12,097,281, 4.2%
Hispanic - 40,459,196, 14.2%
[We're compelled to use the inappropriate term 'Hispanic,' when what is really meant is Mestizo, because we're citing the actual government documents, which persist in using this confusing non-racial term. -- Ed.]

Total Below Poverty Line by Race

Whites - 16,870,000
Blacks - 9,000,000
Asian - 1,209,000
Hispanic - 9,132,000

Percent of Population Below Poverty Line

Whites - 7.8%
Blacks - 25.9%
Asian - 10%
Hispanic - 22.6%

That's a fairly convincing percentage; a quarter of American Blacks live below the poverty line while less than 10% of Whites do. In other words, Blacks are more likely to be poverty stricken than Whites. The numbers don't lie; there it is. But wait. 37 million people in poverty, 17 million are White?

Let's look at the percentages based on poverty figures instead of total population. Remember, the total below the poverty line is 37,000,000 (36, 997,000).

Total Below Poverty Line by Race

Whites - 16,870,000
Blacks - 9,000,000
Asian - 1,209,000
Hispanic - 9,132,000

Percentage of Total Below Poverty Line by Race

Whites - 45.6%
Blacks - 24.3%
Asian - 3.3%
Hispanic - 24.7%

So if you had 100 poor people in a group, 25 would be Black, 25 would be 'Hispanic,' and 46 would be White.

Admittedly, yes, black people have a higher percentage IN RELATION TO THEIR OWN POPULATION that is below the poverty line. BUT, the majority of blacks are NOT poor. In fact, blacks don't even make up the majority of poor in the U.S., whites do. Second, whites aren't 'majority rich' either. The majority of whites are middle class, which they have remained at for a very very long time. A minority of whites, less than 1%, are fabulously rich. In fact, the jews make far more than the average white, and they make up a larger amount of the rich rich class.

Whiteness is not associated with 'richness,' jewishness is a much closer approximation. Whiteness is associated with middle-classness.



"American isn't a white country. And that will be shown to be the truth in the next 80-90 years. You're going to eventually have to deal with this undeniable fact before it deals with you (harshly)."

About the latter, you are absolutely correct; about the former you are incorrect. America is currently a white country with heavy amounts of minorities, and American was a 'white' country. In the future, America will not be a white country (which is our own damn fault because we tend to actually be one of the least ethnocentric-minded races, read http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol2no2/km-unique.html by Professor Kevin MacDonald ), unless white people do something about it. And, as I was pleasantly surprised to find out, they are.

Go on, threaten us. Threaten white people. Tell us that we're evil. Mistreat us with words. Abuse us. Blame us for things that have nothing to DO with us, with long-gone civiliZations long dead. Buy into your revisionist history that uses the white race as its scapegoat, and puts a burden on those living who have nothing to do with the dead. Keep on playing that game. But, I'm going to ask you; do you really want to piss white people off? Do you really want to have a fight with the white race on your hands?

Well, I'm going to appeal to your sense of fair play. This isn't about white supremacy. This is about something far more foundational. It's about the preservation of my people and my way of life. I respect your right to do that; I'm going to ask you to respect my right to do that. Go to a black country. You have plenty of choices. Hell, if you manage to improve those countries, you become a black hero. There is much work to be done in those places, and it should be black people doing it. The age of every white country being multiracial and multicultural is about over. As you might have noticed, if you do any research on the current affairs of the U.S. or Europe, white survival and preservation is becoming a very popular idea. The fact that you hear anything about this with a (jewishly and liberally) biased media says that there are a great deal more people that support these ideas than you would think. A silent majority won't stay silent forever. You watch; things are changing.

Oh, and I'd also like to mention here, that if you are being fair-minded, you have to admit that the poor majority is white. So, you would be far more accurate to say that poorness is associated with whiteness rather than blackness, because a majority of the poor are white.

"How can you deny the striization of blacks whom scored higher than whites on IQ tests in the 1940's?"

Sterilized for high IQ? Please provide a source.

There are still some blacks that test higher than some whites on IQ tests. People born with severe genetic defects tend to have lower IQs.

As for sterilization and eugenics laws in the U.S., 90% of the people sterilized under eugenics laws were white. What in the world are you complaining about?

http//ww/...

>>83

In America, a majority of the white people are poor because whites are the majority in America. Nothing you wrote refutes that. Blacks are disportionally impoverished in a country where there were systems set up to ensure there would be unequal treatment. Nothing in your post refutes that, either.

White hands alone did not build this country. White hands alone do not continue the growth of this country. Whites did didn't invent democracy. They didn't even invent the ideal. And White hands alone did not build this country's culture. America ceased to belong soley to whites the moment you started letting everyone in and the moment you gyped this land from non-whites. Which is basically from the beginning. Keep in mind this also includes races that were never considered "white"- namely the scottish and the irish. When the English conquered them they were assimilated in an Alexanderian fashion into "The white race".

There's a reason why the Dutch and other "white countries" take your overtly supremacist notions as a bit of a lark. It's because "white people" don't exist. If Iceland, Norway or Dutch decides to kick out the arabs- they are doing so out of "Dutchness" or "Icelandicness"- not out of "whiteness". 

To be "American" isn't to be white. I realize that you *think* this to be true because you are so immensly loyal to the "white race". Your whiteness is your identity. The problem with everything you're saying is that I don't consider myself "black" in the same way you consider yourself "white". Inside, I don't "feel like a black man". Or "think like a black man".

Ever hear the term "Petty Cash" or "Walking Money"? That's what "my race" is to me. A frivilous social commoditity. An act people take part in because society has given them little choice. Anyway...

"Go on, threaten us. Threaten white people. Tell us that we're evil. Mistreat us with words. Abuse us. Blame us for things that have nothing to DO with us, with long-gone civiliZations long dead. Buy into your revisionist history that uses the white race as its scapegoat, and puts a burden on those living who have nothing to do with the dead. Keep on playing that game. But, I'm going to ask you; do you really want to piss white people off? Do you really want to have a fight with the white race on your hands?"

What I said wasn't a threat. Your idea of change is a return to old ways. And it's a very clever deception to turn this into some "new movement" or "neo" sentiment among the white population. This is nothing but delusion on your part.

The only way this can be a threat to you- is if you are afraid of losing "white privelage". This change- should only effect those who have unfairly, unjustly and unethically used (and abused) white privelage under the misguided notion that this country "belongs to them". Whites proved to the rest of the world that such notions of posession are merely convienant at best.

It is in this way that you set yourselves up for abuse. You *are* afraid. And your list of atrocities commited in the effort of quelling this fear are long and any resistence to the coming change will be enacted from that primal cowardice.

Another aspect of your arugment that you refuse to acknowledge is that you can not claim to have nothing to do with the henious actions of "your people" and at once readily accept "all the good" you think your race has done "for humanity".

You keep repeating the same shit over and over like useless dogma. And you've yet to explain to me, how one can "revision" the holocaust, the atomic attack on japan, African colonization, East Indian colonization, South/North Amerindian colonization, Slavery, Jim Crow?

You simply must understand that you cannot leave unreconciled...the fact that whites have been at the focal point of a lot of artocious world events and crimes against humanity...al in the name of "your race" and this notion that you've been "the nicest race".

What irks me about you in particular is that everyone on these forums seems able to express a degree of doubt or at least question themselves. As a 13 year child I was led to believe that everything black and from Africa is pure and good. And that whites have done everything bad and tainted everything.

I have the sense enough to question MY culture. Why do you not question yours, if not out of loyality and the superiority complex you happily wear as a prize?