Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Women owe their existence to MEN

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 22:46

Monica Lewenski, some nameless whore, sucks off big Billy C in the oval office. And bam! Instant fame and fortune.

Men, the real thinkers, movers and shakers of history. When you think Genius, you think of the great male minds throughout time.

But women, all women do is exploit their gender to try and gain levrage in modern society. Women in business move up in ranks by whoring themselves out to men. They're underqualified and over paid, all because men allow them to be so.

Whenever you see a successful women, you know there were men who allowed her to be successful. Because that was the cause of affect of her "accomplishments".

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 23:03 (sage)

Thought provoking. A little bit of truth, and ignores nobel prize winners who were bitch ugly. Women use their assets to good measure, big deal. The ones that are smart use their brains to good measure, big deal. The ones that aren't, don't. But, who has the real power? The people that control the men. Who control the men? The women. So, bow to your masters. You don't have many politicians or scientists when nobody has the gall or the guts to have children. 

What's the deal in comparing women to men? That's one of nature's paradoxes that can't be changed and must be accepted.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 23:05

>>1

Translation: I have no social skills with the opposite sex, and villifying women is the only way I can cope with them.

Were you an orphan who hated your mother? Get laid, fag.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 23:06

>>1

Women as a gender have a history of being underminded by men. It's only recently that we've approached them as equals. You under estimate the power of social conditioning when you start talking about who accomplished what and why.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 23:16

>>3

You don't always need a reason to do something.

What next, going to assume I'm american?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 0:13

>>1 sure got attacked.  Now if this were a race thread, well...

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 0:22

>>6
it because the people who think women should be barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen don't really care.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 0:32

>>5
actually you do need a reason to do anything

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 0:54

Women and Men aren't equal in many terms, but that doesn't mean one is inferior. Men tend to think with left brain that governs abstract and mathematical intellicenge, while women think with right which governs social intellicenge. Then ofcourse men are more physically stronger than women. Those are biggest differences. One may wonder why greatest scientists, politicians, painters, composers etc. are mostly men, but I suspect that reason lies in how parents tend to raise girls and what parents expect their girl do to.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 0:55

ur in NO'MAAMs land now baby

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 2:22

seed in belly

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 4:22

>>9

The world's first computer programmers were women.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 8:03

Male sperm cells have thinner cell membranes which make them more likely to mutate, as a result men have a larger range of intelligences than women. This is a double edged sword as men are more likely to be very stupid aswell as very intelligent. During adolescance, boys may not be able to respond to testosterone in a positive manner and can be disobedient which can affect their education and concentration. Men and women are not biologically set to think of things abstractly and emotionally respectively. It is a preference and either can train their minds to do both. A man can multitask with enough practice and a woman can become a mathematician or a physicist if she studies as much as the next man. While there may be more male geniuses, usually these genes are passed on and enter the gene pool and women may be born with the same gift. The male genius/female genius ratio is lopsided towards males due to discrimination.

Intelligence and technology are not closely correlated. Einstein, despite his achievements, was a loser in his later life as he could not contemplate quantum theory beyond what other scientists had put forward or discoverred. Scientists who would have never achieved the same as him excelled in quantum theory due to the practical elements involved. One intelligence does not fit all, a gifted mathematician cannot be a gifted musician. The chances are you can do something most people cannot even if you think you are not gifted or plain stupid. This is why non-discriminate free-enterprise societies prosper as they allow people to discover and pursue their abilities which organises the workforce more efficiently.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 13:32

>>12
Someone tell Jon von Neuman.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List