Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Is it time to dismantle Amber Alert?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 9:19

I'm sure that somewhere along its creation there was an actual reason for it, but has anyone noticed only suburbanite scum use this, in order to locate children who've been outside playing too long and they can't be bothered to find it?
When those two little black kids went missing, I thought it was pretty insane the first thing they did was raid all the sex offenders' domiciles in a citywide search. Have we ever done the same when someone, even someone important was murdered, with all previously-convicted-then-released murderers and manslaughterers? WTF IS SO IMPORTANT ABOUT A BUNCH OF LITTLE SNOTS THAT CAN'T EVEN BE BOTHERED TO SIT STILL DURING A FUCKING MOVIE? So anyway, discuss how we can get rid of this eighth leg of the law, and what should, if any, replace, it, and also why this worthless crime is the only one we bother putting up information about, when religio-racist idiocy (KKK, AoG), anti-social disorders which lead to serial killings or passion murders, and even petty thievery leads to more moral decay and costs us more in potential years lost. Sure it sucks when your kid is the one that gets taken away from you in a legitimate case, but most of what this is being used for is as worthless as US rape and/or consent laws. Now going missing for an hour is a national fucking outcry instead of a community search. The last Amber Alert I'm aware of involved a dumbshit redneck kid slipping in a pond and drowning, and there's probably been six more since then that allowed the American gestapo to knock in your walls for fucking your girlfriend when you were legal and she wasn't. It's time laws that allowed women and oafish couch potatos to be lazy fuckheads and let the police do their work for them be done away with entirely.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 14:07 (sage)

>>1 tl;dr
paragraph breaks, learn them, love them.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 22:14

>>1
Pedophiles make up a rather small portion of the population, and their apparent number is even smaller because hardly anyone openly (in America, at least) admits to being a pedophile.  Thus, the pedophiles get shit on and demonized by everyone else, regardless of logic or consistency in our laws.  That's about all there is to it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 0:31

>>3
Nobody gives a shit about the rights of sex offenders, much less pedophile sex offenders. Not even pedos, those who haven't committed a crime, care about the rights of pedo sex offenders.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 1:18

>>3
Real number of pedos is rather high. Probably around same as number of gays. I have met more pedos than I've met gays, even though I'm not pedo myself, but being perverted, gay and big yaoi & anime fan you meet all kinds of people. They may not be a majority, but they still are quite big minority. Those pedos who actually abuse children or plan to do so and see nothing wrong with it, seem to be very small minority(if not myth). Haven't ever met anyone like that.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 19:14

>>1
As a native might say in this situation...
"White man, you speak your own tongue poorly, but have many important things to say. Please return to us when you are less fretful over life, and mayhaps your sound logic will open closed ears. Oh yeah, hooooow."

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 0:29

Fuck yes, this isn't an alert system it's a "Stupid WASP kid" detector.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 2:48

>>5

enjoying drawings of mostly 13-15 year olds is not the same as wanting to rape a 3 year old in real life. You've met people who like lolicon, not real pedophiles.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 3:47

>>8
But huge number of them said they also like real girls, they just don't rape them and they watch only legal stuff.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 4:02

In the constitution, I remember it mentioning that you can't be charged twice for a crime. So, as such, I find it unconstitutional if you went to prison and served your time, then were forced to give up your right of privacy (oh dear, constitution foiled again!)

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 15:01

>>10
The laws are already in place, so if you commit the crime going to jail and giving up your privacy is a punishment, just like when you commit a serious felony you lose your right to vote for a while

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 15:28

>>7
Yeah, saw some commercials for Geraldo, who is doing a huge special on Natalee Holloway (talking about profiting off of someone else's misfortune).  Geraldo, much less the rest of the white community, couldn't give two shits about minorities.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 20:09

Geraldo Riviera is a Mexican-American and comes from a long like of all Mexican ancestry. He is not part of the 'white community', he merely profits from it.>>12

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 23:31

>>10
>>11
Don't forget there's ways around double jeopardy in the constitution as well...Charging with a similar but less dangerous crime for instance, which in legalese IS different.
(You go in for murder, get out, if the victim's family is still jonesin' for you they can hit you with manslaughter. That's an extreme and unheard of example but it is a possibility.)

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List