Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Attention White People

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-15 23:52

I heard about this site from one of my ‘white’ friends and am absolutely horrified by you little fucking crackers. Where do you fuckers think you can get off thinking that we are dumb shits? Horrible pictures. We’re not dumb niggers. The list of stupid white folks goes on forever. George Bush? You racists!

A few things you white-folk need to be aware of… mainly cause I’m not wasting much more time here.
One: Nigger is not your word to use to describe us. And I’ve never once called one my homies Nigger. Its Nigga, There’s a difference.
Two: You’re afraid that we’re more successful then you white people. This posturing bullshit about wanting to kill us off is just more of your typical white trash!
Third: My dick is bigger then yours. Its true.

Lets be honest here there are so many wanna be whites trying to be black. Deep in side you all want to be like us. You’re jealous of our culture. Our women are hotter then your ugly ass white girls. And you cannot stop our growing dominance as a group of people in society. You ARE ALL White Trash!

Around blacks never relaxes? Fuck you whites. Around the white, nothing seems right!

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-21 1:18

Crackers are just niggers with pinched noses, white skin, straight (and/or wavy) hair, and fancy buildings.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-21 1:20

Chinks are just niggers with slanty eyes and straight hair and flat faces. Oh yeah, and tan/pale skin.

Name: AC 2006-12-21 2:49

>>319

No, it's not *my* problem you fucktard. It's a problem that's not only effecting blacks but effecting other minorities and low-income whites as well. As it stands Aristocratic American society offers us nothing more than to be a gear in a rusty and broken down machine who's programming is built around retaining the status quo. "Getting a decent job" has never been the problem for blacks, or for anyone, it's the persistance of negative cultural memes leading to certain forced roles in society. Forced roles of servitude without any real roles that allow blacks to shape their own destiny outside of the context of slavery and the racism that followed.

Don't worry about it, Junior. You'll learn all about it...once you graduate high school.

>>320

"No need to pound your chest or show your teeth. The only way it's affected you is that it has created for you an excuse to be lazy and have a sense of hopelessness and blame anyone of the caucasian race for you disposition. "Oh poor me!, whitey fucked up my universe and I haven't tried to strive for improvement, I think I'll just drink a 40, sell some dope, or buttrape white women." The only way it might have affected me is that throughout my youth, I've been dodging all of your race's bullshit slander."

This is precisely why people like you get pegged as bigots. There's a difference between political correctness and outright bigotry. The people claiming to 'merely be against PC' are usually people who don't understand that difference to begin with.

It's illogical for you to think that I'm lazy, unambitious or capable of realizing my dreams because you have never met me, don't know my name, don't know what I do for a living. However, what you do know is that I am black...and for that I guess I'm automatically predisposed to wanting to raping white women and selling drugs? How is that not racism? How is that not discrimination or at the very least prejudice?

Multiply your sentiments a million times over and you've got the world we've got now: One where racial harmony can't take place simply because you don't even respect me objectively as a human being.

Instead of contending with me on my point you decide instead to liken me to an ape? Who's the real half-man, when you don't even perscribe to logic? Who's the real slanderer when you decidedly ignore history?

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-21 9:02

>>323
"the persistance of negative cultural memes leading to certain forced roles in society."
Oh I see, so saying anyone who isn't a liberal is a racist, claiming the word "black" is racist making everyone use the term "African American" then making them use the word "black" again after a few years, repeating cliches like "DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH" ad nauseum and claiming ancient egypt was black (The Kush were, the Egyptians weren't, get over it) will eliminate these evil cultural memes and all your problems will be over. Well, whatever. Just quit calling everyone a racist when they reveal you are full of shit and instead just admit you are wrong. That way we can get along. Capiche?

Name: ac 2006-12-21 19:40

>>324

This is what you don't understand. I didn't tell anyone the word "black" was racist. I'm not a "liberal" by any means. Nor am I a conservative. My concern has always been for the commonwealth. To assume that an individual is a certain way based on generalities is wrong and illogical.

"Diversity is strength" isn't a cliche, it's Darwinism, it's a fact of life. America isn't an all white country. Granted, the majority of people in actual power are white, but there is a difference between those who wield a countries power and those who make a country powerful. Do you think the People make America powerful or do you think America's leaders are what make it powerful? America is the most modern multi-cultural society on earth. And America is the most dominate country on the earth. I don't think that's a coincidence.

Second of all, if you actually did your homework you'd know that Egypt wasn't completely "black or arab" it was mixture of many races similar to what we have in America. Black, Burbur and Arab...all ruled Egypt at some point.

Finally, go back to the last couple of posts and point out where it was "revealed that I was full of shit". What was I full of shit about, exactly? Do you even know or are you just talking out of AIDS infested asshole again?

The only way we can get along is if you're capable of responding to me as an individual human being. The reason I say that America still has a problem regarding race is because there are people like you around who think it's alright to judge my character based on some ignorant stereotypes, which were created by the same people who enslaved my race, who just happen to be your ancesters.

Oh, so you say your great-great grandparents weren't slave owners? That's fine. But they did grow up in a society that allowed for the sub-human treatment of blacks. And this is my only concern here, if you have a problem me wanting to help people- I can only assume that it's because you want to destory them.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-22 0:00

>>325
I may not understand why you claim not to be a liberal but lash out at anyone who dares criticise every policy that liberals typically support, but here's the major thing YOU don't get! If something is useless and pointless, DON'T EXPECT PEOPLE TO CARE! You think people are idiots and can't be persuaded to be more open, so you come up with dogmas like tolerance, diversity and multi-culturalism instead of just being honest with people and persuading them to be more open. I will not tolerate people, I will give them the greatest sign of trust by giving them legitimate criticism if they are acting like asses and this is in no way intolerant. I will not support diversity, just like I won't support purity, they are irrelevant. I won't push for multi-culturalism or mono-culturalism, I will instead push for openness and be honest to people up to their face the exact reasons why I am telling them to be open instead of assing around and not doing anything useful.

"Black, Berber and Arab...all ruled Egypt at some point."
If you want to look for the area where arabs and blacks mix you will want to go much further south to today's Sudan which incidentally is the same region that the Nubians and Kush inhabitted. So be sure to strike black off that list and replace it with "mixed".

Name: ac 2006-12-22 0:30

>>326

There's clearly alot you don't understand if you still think that liberalism or conservatism has anything to do with race issues in America. Any side of the political spectrum can pick up the race issue anytime they want and both have used race for political leverage before in the past. Was not Lincoln a Republican and a conservative who wished to retain the status quo of the union?

You think people are idiots and can't be persuaded to be more open, so you come up with dogmas like tolerance, diversity and multi-culturalism instead of just being honest with people and persuading them to be more open.

This is a straw man argument. I never came up with any dogmas regarding tolerance or diversity and you can't point out any instance where I implictly stated anything. As far as I'm concerned diversity is inherant in nature. It doesn't need a dogma when the proof are the most dominant countries on the face of the earth. Egyptians, Romans, Greeks, Americans, no empire has made it on one race and one culture. Arguing with me would be like having a shouting match with a history book. 

I will not tolerate people, I will give them the greatest sign of trust by giving them legitimate criticism if they are acting like asses and this is in no way intolerant. I will not support diversity, just like I won't support purity, they are irrelevant. I won't push for multi-culturalism or mono-culturalism, I will instead push for openness and be honest to people up to their face the exact reasons why I am telling them to be open instead of assing around and not doing anything useful.

You are a fool if you think this is about earning your trust, this is about earning respect on a individual level. Your criticisms are of a group of people and they based strictly on generalities and a feedback loop of cultural memes. Not on an individual-to-individual basis. That's illogical and thus: You fail. 

The problem is, you only want to hear what you want to hear largly because you are too stupid and apathetic to truly be open. You think accusing me of being a drug dealer, a rapist is going to make me be more open!? Are you trolling or just completely retarded?

I have news for you: This is the real world. You can't sit on the fence when it comes to racism. Either you are actively fighting racism and discrimination or you're not. And since you've ALREADY prejudged me, then I can only assume that you're in a state of denial when it comes to your inner bigot.

If you want to look for the area where arabs and blacks mix you will want to go much further south to today's Sudan which incidentally is the same region that the Nubians and Kush inhabitted. So be sure to strike black off that list and replace it with "mixed".

lol, Gbt2 African Studies and go back Geneology 101. Unless you have some new fangled proof that Blacks, Berber and Arab DIDN'T all live side-by-side in Eygpt...then your statement isn't certifiable. We covered this in the Race Thread, as you well remember. You didn't have proof then either.  

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-22 7:56

Niggers like to wank.
Kikes like to wank.
Crackers like to wank.
Sand-niggers like to wank.
Chinks like to wank.
Japs like to wank.
Gooks like to wank.
Dagos like to wank.
Wogs like to wank.
Weeaboos like to wank.
The Injun redskins like to wank.
Savage barbarians like to wank.
Headhunters like to wank.
Even the Neanderthals liked to wank.

at least there's one thing the world can agree upon... do it discreetly and/or even call it a sin, but even behind closed doors, masturbation is "in"!

Name: oops, left out ethnic group 2006-12-22 8:00

Spics like to wank, too.

Name: penis LOL 2006-12-22 17:24

Nigga + Nigger = same thing FTW!

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-23 11:03

lol@racism on a board that has code designed to imitate Japanese software.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-23 11:31

>>328
Damn niggers.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-23 12:07

>>327
Bullshit: "This is a straw man argument."

You just said vehemently supported "diversity" etc... for the sake of some arbitrary unrelated incidents in history.

Bullshit: "no empire has made it on one race and one culture"
Mongols, Greeks, Chinese, British, Japanese. To say that having one culture or race immediately makes you inferior is as bad as saying being of mixed race or culture makes you inferior. My point was that it doesn't matter either way so there is no point diverting from what actually matters such as openness and objectivity. Clearly I am right and you are a vicious reactionary bigot. I bet you $5000 that if you and me were to go up to a black man on the street who has experienced racism and ask him if he wants to be treated objectively or whether he should be called superior for having white and black ancestors and he will say he wants to be treated objectively.

Bullshit: "Your criticisms are of a group of people and they based strictly on generalities and a feedback loop of cultural memes."
You see. I was right. The moment I disagree with you it means I am a racist, or a believer in "cultural memes" as you now call it. If you are capable of timing out the hate for one second and actually listen to what I am saying rather than your rampant paranoia, please do so...

If you use the dictionary's definition of "legitimate criticism" instead of the definition you put in my mouth as part of your straw man argument you can see that there is nothing immoral with giving someone legitimate criticism. Maybe my idea of legitimate criticism is flawed, but wouldn't it be patronising to flatter someone all the time and dismiss all the mistakes they make? It would be like me treating them like a spoiled child. I prefer to treat people like fellow human beings and not be afraid to give them legitimate criticism when it is necessary.

Bullshit: "Unless you have some new fangled proof that Blacks, Berber and Arab DIDN'T all live side-by-side in Eygpt...then your statement isn't certifiable."
I just said the Kush who invaded Egypt were of mixed race which implies that they had people with arab and black blood in their veins, therefore you are putting words in my mouth.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-23 12:08

>>333
You just vehemently*

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-23 14:58

Name: AC 2006-12-23 16:06

You just said vehemently supported "diversity" etc... for the sake of some arbitrary unrelated incidents in history.

PROOF. Without proof that I "support diversity" and further proof that the events in question were "arbitrary unrelated incidents in history" is needed if you are make a valid point. I don't "support diversity" because diversity doesn't need "support"- it's self-evident in nature. Diversity habitually occurs with or with anyone's support. You must not be too big on Darwin.

Mongols, Greeks, Chinese, British, Japanese.

None of these have operated and prospered based on ideals that were exclusive to that culture or race alone. Are you just giving up and trying to prove my point for me now?

My point was that it doesn't matter either way so there is no point diverting from what actually matters such as openness and objectivity.

That's right. But only seconds ago you accused me of selling drugs, being unambitious, being a liberal and raping white women with no basis for those claims other than me being black. How is that objective and how does heaping negative unwarranted stereotype upon an individual make them more open? Care to explain?

You see. I was right. The moment I disagree with you it means I am a racist, or a believer in "cultural memes" as you now call it. If you are capable of timing out the hate for one second and actually listen to what I am saying rather than your rampant paranoia, please do so...

The only thing you were (and are) is delusional. You are a racist and believer and user of negative cultural memes because you claimed that I was a drug dealer, a rapist, unambitious and lazy because I am black. Are you backpeddling? Because I can easily reference where you said these things.

From post >>320: The only way it's affected you is that it has created for you an excuse to be lazy and have a sense of hopelessness and blame anyone of the caucasian race for you disposition. "Oh poor me!, whitey fucked up my universe and I haven't tried to strive for improvement, I think I'll just drink a 40, sell some dope, or buttrape white women."

Maybe my idea of legitimate criticism is flawed, but wouldn't it be patronising to flatter someone all the time and dismiss all the mistakes they make? It would be like me treating them like a spoiled child. I prefer to treat people like fellow human beings and not be afraid to give them legitimate criticism when it is necessary.

Not only is it definately flawed. But it is entirely illegitimate when you don't make those criticisms objectively. How is claiming that I'm a drug dealer, a rapist, or a lazy criminal because I don't agree with you objective? You've never met me. You're the one making these comments. You're the one making yourself look like not only a bigot but a hypocrite.

I just said the Kush who invaded Egypt were of mixed race which implies that they had people with arab and black blood in their veins, therefore you are putting words in my mouth.

This is a rediculous assumption in the first place especially coming from the perspective of white historians. Have you ever seen someone who is half-black and half-arab? Did the "one-drop" rule only apply in circumstances where blacks couldn't be linked to any great empires? In light of history one begins to question if the geneology really has anything to do with anything and more should be emphasized on the native cultures. I have seen no proof that Egyptian culture even in it's most bastardized and watered down form has had no influence from "black Africa". I don't even like the term "black Africa" in the first place, because Africa was only "completely black" after the flood.

I'll repeat what I said: "Unless you have some new fangled proof that Blacks, Berber and Arab DIDN'T all live side-by-side in Eygpt...then your statement isn't certifiable."

I don't know if you've ever taken a sociology class, but cultures, more to the point cultures that at one point or another dominated the whole planet don't just appear out of nowhere. You're going to have to do better than this, or simply stop arguing this point- you are outmatched.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-23 17:53

Black people fails


/thread

Name: Xel 2006-12-23 18:43

>>336 AC, it is fucking impressive how you try to make these raccoon-hats-for-brains see some sense (i.e. see the validity of arguments that haven't passed through one of their holy front-runners already).

But seriously, these are the little pre- or post-men who laughed when McCain said that Chelsey Clinton was ugly because Reno was the father. Boys who do not want to move from the couch. Unsalvagable, incorrigible.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-23 19:03

Name: AC 2006-12-23 19:32

>>338

I agree with everything except that Chelsey Clinton is ugly and it is very likely that Reno, in fact, has male genitalia. It's obvious Bill never touched Hillary...so you do the maths. There is alot I don't agree with McCain on, but he's one funny guy.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-23 23:15

>>338
What huge colossal major point exactly has AC crushed me in debate with? It cannot even clearly define any of it's arguments. All AC does is go around in circles and nitpick. Look..

>>336
"PROOF. Without proof that I "support diversity" and further proof that the events in question were "arbitrary unrelated incidents in history"
I'm not going to repeat myself.
>>325
""Diversity is strength" isn't a cliche, it's Darwinism..."

"None of these have operated and prospered based on ideals that were exclusive to that culture or race alone."
Every culture can trace their ideas to other cultures, so what exactly is your definition of mono-culturalism? If no culture is 100% mono-cultural what's the point in pushing "diversity". They weren't succesful becuase they valued "diversity", but because they were open to new ideas. The Mongols didn't conquer most of Asia because they adopted circumcision or African philosophy. Why push for diversity when you can have unity and openness? Unity and openness throughout the free world is what defeated the communists, not diversity and division.

"But only seconds ago you accused me of selling drugs, being unambitious, being a liberal and raping white women with no basis for those claims other than me being black."
um... No i didn't.... That must have been someone else...

In fact reading back to see who you might be referring to I can see why you are so pissed.

I think I'll leave this discussion here....

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-24 5:48

"This is precisely why people like you get pegged as bigots. There's a difference between political correctness and outright bigotry. The people claiming to 'merely be against PC' are usually people who don't understand that difference to begin with.

It's illogical for you to think that I'm lazy, unambitious or capable of realizing my dreams because you have never met me, don't know my name, don't know what I do for a living. However, what you do know is that I am black...and for that I guess I'm automatically predisposed to wanting to raping white women and selling drugs? How is that not racism? How is that not discrimination or at the very least prejudice?

Multiply your sentiments a million times over and you've got the world we've got now: One where racial harmony can't take place simply because you don't even respect me objectively as a human being.

Instead of contending with me on my point you decide instead to liken me to an ape? Who's the real half-man, when you don't even perscribe to logic? Who's the real slanderer when you decidedly ignore history?"

You just never know when to drop it. Ape? I never said it. I wasn't a biggot until affirmative action created a system of reverse racism, taking away privileges from those more deserving than those who never payed their dues. You're right, I don't know you, and I know not all black people try to argue things like this 'til Hell freezes over. I don't hate your race personally. I know black people who did work hard to become doctors,engineers,etc.When many people of a certain ethnicity fill out perfectly the stereotypes given to them, it's hard to not label. I will say the media sure makes certain people look bad.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-24 10:44

>>339
Seeing how the predominant amount of Blacks in america live in poverty and are there for denied proper moral teachings and education, you can see why that happens. Your argument is based off the failings of society.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-24 11:43

>>343
Your argument is based off the failings of black society.

Fixed

Name: rang 2007-02-19 0:36

Typical nigger, can always spot a nigger with a limited
amount of grey matter because as always without exception,
they talk about the size of their dicks.
I wonder why it is that you never hear any coments on the size of their brains? I guess, when you think about it, it is not to difficult to figure this one out.

Name: Irish girl 2007-02-27 1:52 ID:eyWgpK5B

So does every one on here make racist comments?

If so,then i can fit in here

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-27 2:37 ID:ge8y6KiC

Welcome "girl"

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-27 3:03 ID:ge8y6KiC

>>345


Intelligent people = bad in niggermentia.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-27 4:03 ID:x9hWPTna

Shut up dumb nigger, dont you fuckin try "reasoning" with me MR Below Average IQ :P

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-27 14:55 ID:xzPIKycA

OP was white. Obviously.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List