“The show must go on.”

Angry judge puts Moussaoui trial on hold

Brinkema says U.S. government committed ‘egregious violation’

ALEXANDRIA, Va. - An angry federal judge considered Monday whether to dismiss the government’s death penalty case against confessed al-Qaida conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui after a federal attorney coached witnesses in violation of her rules.

Once again, the U.S. government demonstrates that they can't even properly orchestrate a propaganda trial. First they let Saddam Hussein tell the whole world The Truth, then they assassinate Slobodan Milosevic in jail (who apparently died of poisoning according to toxicologists, despite early reports that he had a heart attack) because he's showing everyone their criminal imperialist lies, and finally they need to coach witnesses to LIE to convict Zacarias Moussaoui, and then they get caught doing it!

They need to take more lessons from Hitler and Stalin, the real founding fathers of the United States of AmeriKKKa.

>>2

I'm American and fully endorse this.

Never doing anything right and leaving a trail of inconsistency, corruption and error and having completely random unaffiliated people coming out on top and succeeding is the american way.

It's called chaos and it works, get over it.

>>2

You people never cease to amaze me if a butcher and thug like Sadam says something why it must be true only because he is against the eviiiil buuuush so anything against the buuuush is ok. Do you anti buuush tards never think off anything else life must be a real shitter for you guys everythig you see is buuuush OMG, lol how pathetic.

Milosevic? WTF has the US to do with that, except for 'the first black president' bombing the shit out of them and no one uttering a peep (i.e. limo-liberals in hollywierd), that's the wonderful euro/world/kangaroo-court working at its best, since it looks like they can't even convict the one Euro who had the balls to take care of your little islamic invasion over there, they bumped him off.

Hitler and Stalin...that's right because you know 100 million burgeois have been murdered in the USA along with a few million jews, that's right the USA coming from Soviet Nazi Russia...

>>5

You just aren't very smart. I'm sure somewhere in your head you have a well-thought out reply to >>2, but you just jumped the gun. Your post is so easy to deconstruct that I almost want to hand you my keyboard and let you do it yourself.

But let's start with the most obvious: "Buuuussssshhhhh" is a generalism for this entire administration. I know people who voted for the guy who are saying now that he hasn't done ONE thing right in 6 years. The notion that you could apologise or provide an adequate defense for the major mistakes this administration has made is beyond laughable.

And remember if you reply with the words: "Nigger", "Kike" or "Liberal"...that is an automatic lose for you.

>>6
FUCK YOU NIGGER KIKE LIBERAL

>>5

Saddam Hussein isn't a great guy but that doesn't mean he isn't right. His trial is an illegal criminal act and anyone who truly believes in justice and truth as guiding ethical principles should demand they declare a mistrial and let him go. Everyone else is either a hypocrite, or guided by other ethical principles... and if truth and justice aren't important to them, then how can you believe a word that comes out of their mouth?

>>8 illegal criminal act

Just out of morbid curiosity, how long did you have to torture your logic before it confessed to that bizarre conclusion?

If you think the United Nations should do something about it....

                      LOL UN

>>9

It's simple; the United States has no jurisdiction to try sovereign rulers of foreign nations for crimes committed against citizens of that nation, and on that nation's soil.

Furthermore, even if you accede to the ludicrous premise that Iraqi's are doing with Mr. Hussein what they would have done with him anyway, without coercion from the United States, then you have to ask yourself, what standards of legitimacy obtain that allow them to hold such a trial?

Simply put, the current Iraqi government is just another in a long line of American puppet regimes.

If someone invaded your country, selected its leaders, coached them on selecting their judiciary, and then demanded they try you for crimes they say you committed, would that seem to be in accordance with the rule of law? No. It's pure punch and judy.

>>11
To be honest I wouldn't care what happened.  If my country was treating me the way iraq treated its people under saddam, I wouldn't feel any national pride at all.  Certainly not enough to care what the new leader does with it.

>>12

But >>11 isn't talk about how YOU *feel*. He's talk about the facts. And these facts are what have led Iraq to cannibalize itself.

>>13

talking*

>>11 fails it.

The US isn't trying Saddam.  The new, democratically-elected and sovereign Iraqi government is trying Saddam.  You know, the sovereign Iraqi government that the UN recognizes as legitimate?  Yeah, them.

>>15

Read the entirety of my post (#11). The current Iraqi government is an anti-democratic farce. It is not the government that the majority of the people would have selected, if they had been given half a chance. Why is it that the government does not reflect the will of the people? Hmmm... maybe it's because of something George Bush is really good at... "winning" elections... ?

>>16
LOL HE FIXED THE ELECTION LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

God damned conspiracy theorists. 

Anyway, the REAL reason that the government "is not the government that the majority of the people would have selected" is because that's just the way it works when you've got a democracy.  Especially in a country so factional and fractured as Iraq.  Every neighborhood it seemed had its own political leader they wanted to elect.  Therefore, who eventually DOES get elected isn't someone the majority would have endorsed. 

But that's just the breaks when you've got a democracy.