Abortions banned in South Dakota

I love how Bush and friends don't give a shit about children (No Child Left Behind was propped up on proven false results and has been fought tooth and nail by teachers across the US), poor people, or jobs, yet saving the life of a fetus is No. 1 Priority.

It doesn't matter that the kid will grow up into a poor family, get a shit education, have increased college tuition that will put him/her in debt or avoid college, etc. Just saving that fetus is more important.

And now even women with medical conditions or rape victims can't get abortions. I love that logic - you'll die conceiving a child, but the child lives so that makes it OK.

Fuck Bush and his Nazi regime. Our goddamn founders had a seperation of Church and State for a reason.

>>28
Yeah, but here's the difference: in the case of an unborn baby, only *one* person can continue its life, and according to the pro-choicers, that person is obligated to do so.  In the case of all the things you mentioned, this isn't true.  If a child has parents who don't want or are unable to care for him or her, then someone else can assume the role.  Someone will undoubtedly take care of the child, whether it be the government or foster parents, but you can be sure that the person in that situation will be there by choice.  If someone suffers from a disease or accident that leaves him unable to take care of himself, then, once again, it's the *choice* of people to take care of him.