Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Abortions banned in South Dakota

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-06 15:22


I love how Bush and friends don't give a shit about children (No Child Left Behind was propped up on proven false results and has been fought tooth and nail by teachers across the US), poor people, or jobs, yet saving the life of a fetus is No. 1 Priority.

It doesn't matter that the kid will grow up into a poor family, get a shit education, have increased college tuition that will put him/her in debt or avoid college, etc. Just saving that fetus is more important.

And now even women with medical conditions or rape victims can't get abortions. I love that logic - you'll die conceiving a child, but the child lives so that makes it OK.

Fuck Bush and his Nazi regime. Our goddamn founders had a seperation of Church and State for a reason.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-08 15:11

>>25

Again your argument makes no sense, so how long can a new born baby survive on its own without "sucking nutrients" from another being? When i say sucking I am talking care in general if left alone that baby will certainly die and that would be a murder or negligence case of some sort. Even toddlers, are they able to survive without adult care of some sort?

And yet again taking it to the next level how about the those adults who cannot take care of themselves, for example Christopher Reeve as his late wife was in the news, should he just have been killed? since without her or someone else's care there was no way for him to survive so he was "sucking nutrients" too.

So your argument that because the baby is dependant on the mother it is part of the mothers body and so her choice is illegitimate because by that argument parents should be allowed to kill their children after birth too. And a few on the extreme side of the abortion debate advocate just that.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List