Hating Racists is Racist

All around me I see an incredible injustice being committed every day.  Thousands of racists are being discriminated against, being derided in the media, being shunned from social groups, and being avoided by the population at large.

Their genes are inferior, primative, dating back to prehistoric times, when tribes fought against each other, and had to have an easy way to convince themselves that they should irrationally hate their enemy nations.  Back then it was an advantage to believe that humans should be separated from each other, and that certain ones should be made into slaves or killed.

Racists aren't at fault for the way they are; it's their genes that determine that they will be racist.  Therefore, it's immoral to discriminate against them, they just can't help it.

>>Just one thing. Why do blacks like to race mix so much? Almost every other human society has been violenty opposed to it, as it is a death knell for thier society and race. Black people just seem to want to do it, they get off on fucking what is different.

You really are from a countryside village, aren't you?

Well, aside from the undeniable fact that humans have been "race mixing" since recorded history...

...all I have to say is this: Perception is a motherfucker. To white segregationist men it looks like "blacks like to race mix" because they are opposed to it in the first place. I know several black segregationist women that would like to know the same thing about white females. Same applies for any "race".

All it takes is one person (white or black) to fuck someone who isn't of their own race and suddenly the other race is claiming that "so-and-so loves to fuck our people". All of this stupidity just further feeds into the toxic irrationality of the collectivist ego.    

Anyway, it takes two to tango, doesn't it? I gather you could ask the same question and get the same basic answer from anyone (of any race) who doesn't share your views on race and "race mixing". 

>>80
Why would anyone do all that to quote something? What with "this"?

I LIKE BIG BLACK PEENS

>>81
...all I have to say is this: Perception is a motherfucker. To white segregationist men it looks like "blacks like to race mix" because they are opposed to it in the first place. I know several black segregationist women that would like to know the same thing about white females. Same applies for any "race".

Well females are stupid, thier behaviour is defined alot more by society around them, women will do what they're told is ok to do. They don't have the intellect to percieve that they're race mixing or consequences there of, they just do what thier insincts tell them. I'd put it down to thier lack of thought, not saying that race mixing is automatically an idiotic thing. A poor white girl would advantage herself by having a richer black partner then a poor as fuck white one, even though I'd still oppose it.
Men have higher intellects, we can discern things with greater objectivity and purer reason. Although this is becomming less and less the norm in western countries as men are becomming feminised.
The black male doesn't see himself as mixing, I think it is beacuse in the white majourity countries he sees it as normal for people to date white people.

Of all the mass imbecilities which have demoralised mankind, this of racial equality between all peoples, White, Black, Red and Yellow, is the most inane. Politically, it has already stirred up all the minor races into a state of belligerence and discontent which will impose minor wars on the dominant nations for years to come. But when it comes to racial integration between the White and Black races, sanity has descended to the looney bin of the impossible, because the intermixture of blood between those races must degrade the White race to the level of the Negro and cannot raise the Negro to the level of the White. Where today we see some evidence of the effect of education on the Negro it is the White blood in him that stirs some animation in his sluggish mental faculties, but the Negro pure, as he exists in Africa, cannot be educated even up to the standard of the lowest content of the White race. He may learn to parrot all the political and sociological clichés of today, but unless he is buttressed by the White race, and policed by it, he must relapse back to the jungle, which is his predestined habitat.

There appears to be an illusion today that this age is the first one in which the Negro has come into contact with a White civilisation, and so had a chance to benefit by its cultural and sociological ordinances. This is not the case. Since the genesis of this present civilisation some six or seven thousand years ago, the Negro has had contact with many past episodes of civilisation, but always, as each subsided, he has relapsed back to the jungle. The other three races, White, Yellow and Red, have devised their own civilisations, and have maintained them through the ages, but it is only in quite recent years that the Negro has come into relations with them. As in the past, his status has been one of slavery, because he has never been able to compete culturally with their achievements in the arts and crafts and intellectual standards. Nor can he compete today with those same achievements, because he utterly lacks the creative faculty: he has no thumbs. The only thing he ever learned to do was to smelt iron ore and hammer out his spear heads. That weapon was essential to the preservation of his existence in his tribal wars, and his food derived from wild animals able to defend themselves with teeth and claws.

Save for the Chinese, and other Asiatic peoples, all other civilisations were generated on the shores of the Mediterranean and the Negro penetration of them was very slight, except, perhaps, with the Egyptians, who were themselves a dark coloured race, but with no relation to the Negroid peoples. Only the Moors and Arabs, because of their geographical contiguity with Africa, have kept up the slave trade with Negroes, but sexual union with them was strictly prohibited. Or impossible for that matter. By a very simple clinical ritual, the Negro became a harmless guard and menial to the Harem. It is only since the colonisation of Africa by the British, Dutch, French and Belgian peoples that the Negro has become a momentous world problem within the last two decades. The British, French and Belgian peoples solved it for themselves by handing their colonies over to the Negroes. The Dutch could not do that. They had been so long in South Africa that they had built up another white race there—the Boers. And there, the world may be assured, they will remain, and the Negro will not be permitted racial equality with them. What must happen shortly between those peoples is already predestined. The only other country on which the full weight of the Negro falls is America.

And the Politician’s solution to it of race integration is a desperation measure which never can succeed, as the politicians themselves know, but at present, they dare not do anything about it, for President Johnson won the presidential campaign by handing himself over to the largest section of the community to command the vote, just as Roosevelt did to capture the presidential chair. We know that section, which is the pestilential problem of all peoples who seek to keep a sane balance of rationality in the conduct of their political and sociological affairs. In Australia, we call them Wowsers—a stigma word which Mencken incorporated in his American Language, but as yet Americans have not adopted it. A stigma word has great power.

In America the Wowser is the self-elected Dogooder—the temperance crank, the Purity Leaguer, the anti-saloon leaguer, the Comstock bookshop smasher and picture slasher; in short, that chapel product of the cheap suburbs and the rural back blocks which seeks to impose its own horrible codes and doctrines on all that makes life tolerable for well constituted humanity. They are the people who imposed Prohibition on America and very nearly wrecked the country. In Russia, they were largely responsible for the Revolution by cutting off the people’s need for liquor during the 194 war. They are the Pacifists—the peace at any pricers, the appeasers at any threat of war which thereby makes it inevitable by inviting aggression from piratically inclined nations. They are today trying to cripple Johnson’s handling of the Viet Nam war: the finest piece of statecraft since the great days of England as a world power, when half a dozen words from Lord Salisbury was enough to send Russia scuttling back from the Oxus. It is a great pleasure to know that our men are fighting with the Yanks, and that more are being trained to follow, if needed.

It is the Wowser, then, to use one stigma term for a generic type common to America, England, and Australia, who is doing all the mischief today by inflating the Negro with a state of megalomania which convinces him that he is the victim of monstrous injustice by the white peoples, and all revenges on them are his by right of martyrdom. And that revenge he will take whenever he has power to do so.

We must concede him injustice so far in that the Whites have invaded his country and taken possession of large sections of it. In the past, they made a commodity of him in the slave market. Those same Whites have now handed back to him the sections of country they had occupied and have freed him from slavery. Justice can go no further than that.

But America, swung off a sane balance of rationality by the maudlin sentimentality of the Wowsers for the assumed sad lot of the Negroes, has allowed its politicians to establish them in equal civil and social rights with the Whites. They have ordained that the white children must consort intimately with the black offspring from infancy to adolescence, and that alone insures sexual intimacy between the two races. That American mothers—always so passionately possessive over their young—should have allowed them to do such a noxious thing is evidence that they are too dazed by the bulldozing tactics of the politicians to realise its inevitable consequences. It is assumed that education will dispose of the physiological compulsions inherent in all such propinquity of the human species.

Education! This age has become besotted over its assumed potentialities to perform a universal miracle, which is that text books alone can create a civilisation. It ignores the irrefutable evidence that only a civilised mind can be educated. Education is nothing more than a procedure for exercising intellectual faculties which are a content of the mind at birth. It has taken the white race six thousand years to develop those special faculties on which all civilisations have been built. The craftsman’s fingers, the musician’s ear, the artist’s hand and eye, the scientist’s investigation of all natural phenomena are inherited from progenitors who have left behind them the brain cells, and the muscular reflexes essential to all creative effort. And it is now assumed that education, in a generation or two, will allow the wretched Negro to develop those special faculties and so allow him to compete on equal terms with the White race as a civilised being. Imbecility can go no further than such a preposterous assumption.

Already the Negro mass is in a vicious state of resentment because it has not straightway been vested in all the rights and privileges of the Whites. The Los Angeles episode is a sufficient evidence of a universal state of mind among the Negroes. And that is only the beginning of the trouble. When he finds that the higher-class whites will not consort with him on equal terms, and that there is no place for him among the trained working class, no police force in the world will be adequate to control him.

Americans are not a docile people when politicians impose arbitrary interdictions on the free conduct of their civic rights and their private lives. The politicians’ failure to inflict Prohibition on the American people is evidence of what they must expect by this proposal to impose racial integration with the Negroes on them. It only required an adjustment of the legal code to dispose of Prohibition, but no such adjustment can solve the Negro problem for them. There is only one possible solution to that, but I am not going to take it on myself to suggest it. It must be already pregnant in the minds of all higher class American thinkers today.

>>84

Again, it takes two. Second, the dogged and nuerotic sexual selectivity is a token behavior of the feminised male. Or...did you not know that? Typically, men aren't supposed to think doggedly about these things. While I don't agree with your premise that women are so lacking in intellect that they can't make a decision, one of the differences in males & females is the female's natural ability to discern suitors. 

Anyway, race mixing has been around for ages and that can no more be wished out existence than the human drive for sex can be. An objective look at history tells whites and blacks and whoever have been fucking around with each sexually for a quite awhile now and quite natural as it works to benefit of all mankind through genetic diversity.


Well females are stupid, thier behaviour is defined alot more by society around them, women will do what they're told is ok to do. They don't have the intellect to percieve that they're race mixing or consequences there of, they just do what thier insincts tell them. I'd put it down to thier lack of thought, not saying that race mixing is automatically an idiotic thing. A poor white girl would advantage herself by having a richer black partner then a poor as fuck white one, even though I'd still oppose it.
Men have higher intellects, we can discern things with greater objectivity and purer reason. Although this is becomming less and less the norm in western countries as men are becomming feminised.
The black male doesn't see himself as mixing, I think it is beacuse in the white majourity countries he sees it as normal for people to date white people.

>>86
Second, the dogged and nuerotic sexual selectivity is a token behavior of the feminised male. Or...did you not know that?

I thought that was beacuse I browsed 4chan.
And you suppose random and indiscriminate sexual sselection is what a man does? Maybe I am old fashioned in thinking "a man" is more then an animal. Masculinity isn't really in decline people just have the wrong ideas about it. According to the media I'm ethier busting caps or doing calculus.

one of the differences in males & females is the female's natural ability to discern suitors. 

I don't think there is much difference personnaly, women think they can make good choices but for the most part they just follow thier vagina, just like men do.
Real long term mating success, and unless I'm mistaken mating is a long term process as both parents would be required to raise children in a "natural" habitat. Real long term success comes from social compatability, which I personnally also think white people do better with one annother and we all know about dem black dads.

An objective look at history tells whites and blacks and whoever have been fucking around with each sexually for a quite awhile now and quite natural as it works to benefit of all mankind through genetic diversity.

This whole argument about "genetic diversity" or "hybrid vigor" is rubbish, it's all rubbish. Any ammount of hybrid vigour that occurs in humans (which some does occur, over one or two generations) is absolutly negligable, and then far out weighed by social factors. And it doesn't asist in creating extra genetic diversity, for that purpose it'd be better to keep people apart.
There really is no genetic reason people should be race mixing.

I'm no really intensly racist. I don't think we should have a cultural policy of indiscriminate mate selection which does lead to retrogradation of "fitness". And I think it waekens a nations culture and solidarity to be mixed.
Fuck, I can't imagine sitting next to a paki reading his koran aloud on some battlefield somewhere. I'd never get conscripted.

I have still never met a black man who was against race mixing, although I'm pretty sure alot of black women wouldn't. I've met men and women of all races who wouldn't race mix, black men I have met none. Although I've only know some 20 or so in my life.

>>87

There's really not much more for you to say. Nor is there much more for us to argue about, I think. You've not only exposed to me your inexperience and ignorance, but you've said many things that only someone insular and resistant to reason would say. All your beliefs are limited to your few experiences.

However, this isn't your fault. I've been in a hundred threads like these it never seems to come down to a hierarchical and logical discussion with each side civilly citing empirical evidence. These arguments typically never leave their emotional base and I chalk this up to the collectivism and the irrationality associated with modern liberalism.

I'm just going to say this. I know that in comparison to you and I there is a vast intellectual chasm which you have yet to or will fail to bridge. I know you to be inferior to me, yet I refuse to debase myself by treating you *like* you are inferior. My time, unlike yours, isn't spent on message boards calling for segregation or whining that there are laws that require me to treat you like an equal.

There is a reason for this, but since you don't believe that humans are incapable of gleaning enlightenment and change through determinism...I'll leave it unstated.

>>88
>I know you to be inferior to me, yet I refuse to debase myself by treating you *like* you are inferior. My time, unlike yours, isn't spent on message boards calling for segregation or whining that there are laws that require me to treat you like an equal.

Ha ha ha ok mr important time. lol why don't you go and spend your [I}precious time[/I] galabanting with your firends instead of conversing with the loosers on 4chan.

I've been in a hundred threads like these it never seems to come down to a hierarchical and logical discussion with each side civilly citing empirical evidence.

Welcome to the internet. If you really want me to cite where I got the science from then I can.

I'm just going to say this. I know that in comparison to you and I there is a vast intellectual chasm which you have yet to or will fail to bridge. I know you to be inferior to me, yet I refuse to debase myself by treating you *like* you are inferior.

You've not only exposed to me your inexperience and ignorance, but you've said many things that only someone insular and resistant to reason would say. All your beliefs are limited to your few experiences.

Wtf do you know about me? You self rightous prick, just annother nigger male with unwarrented arrogance complex. Typical.

Your a real funny man. intellectual chasm lol I'm one of the top 150 students in my country, when I apply for uni later this year I'll be going to oxbridge or lse or ucl or imperial, anywhere I fucking want to go to. What have you been doing this past year? Apart from wallowing in your self-righteousness and "gleaning enlightenment".

There is a reason for this, but since you don't believe that humans are incapable of gleaning enlightenment and change through determinism...I'll leave it unstated.

I'll leave you to your delusions of a "refined" human race.

I've noticed whenever arguing with a black man he will inevitably accuse you of being "ignorant" at some point. When you ask "ignorant about what?", he will give you a blank look and ramble on about something else. I'm convinced most blacks use the word without knowing its meaning.

>>90
It's funny how you managed to notice the trend in the accusations you face, yet get the most retarded conclusion possible from it.

>>91
You just ign'ant.

Race is equivalent to a social construct. Racists are a social construct. Therefore racists are a race.

>>90

funny! same shit seemed to happen in >>89, >>1, >>25->>38, and several other posts in these thread. so are us lurkers supposed to believe you're all black? this thread is fuckn stoooopppppid. if you got your shit to together race or whatever people think about you don't amount to shit. you think oprah or obama or bill gates or clinton or mccain is spending their time doing this shit fuck no

>>94
Please learn English and then resume your crying.

>>95

by the looks of things you're the only one crying. WAAAAHHHH I WANT SPECIAL TREATMENT, I'M AN AMERIFAG. BLACKS ARE DOING THIS AND THAT BAWWWWWWWWWWWW. stfu already.

This thread is 2 years old, if you guys didn't notice.

>>96
Again, first learn English to understand what you read, so you can maybe formulate an appropriate thought on the subject (though I highly doubt your capabilities on the issue), and then respond in a coherent manner that actually includes some thought rather than your perpetual whining. So, please, try again.

Niggers have so much hate for racists.

Where's the love, BRO?

Where's the love?

It's true.

I mean, look at the fucking Jews - they HATE nazis! That's a HAET KRIME DURRRR HURRRRR

>>98

fuck you, americunt. this is internets and my point is pretty bloody clear without dressing it up. it's cute how you americans feel every ideal presented to you has to be on your terms. your own intellectual communities write entire books predicated upon this fact.

the only reason you're replying to me bawwwwwwing about grammar and such is because you have nothing to say. you keep replying to a two year old thread, mate. WHY, I ask? why do issues of race concern you if you're one of top 150 or whatever. the blackie had it right. if you didn't feel threatened or afraid on some emotional level, you'd stay out of this shit altogether. get a life fagette

>>101
Again, as I said, all your whining stems from your inability to read, you wouldn't have humiliated yourself with this grotesque exposure of ignorance. The fact that you think I'm American etc. makes this whole issue even more pathetic, and your posts about a "two year old thread" are hilariously ironic.

So, keep crying if you like it.

>>102
 i read the thread perfectly well, cunt. we've already established i can't read and i'm humilating myself with this grotesque exposure of ignorance, and yet you can continue to babysit this thread. why? i seriously want to know, americunt. why do you keep replying with pathetic attempts at shouting me down you crybaby fagette? people are laughing at your obsessive devotion to this thread.

and the obvious fact that you're being trolled.

LOSER cunt, tell yer mum i said OI

>>103
Au contraire, YHBT HAND

>>100
wins the thread.

being racist is racist u guys

Yo! 106! Ever heard of Non-Sequitor? Basically what you just said is the sky is blue because it's blue. btw, hating in any fashion is racism at its finest, but unseen to the hater is the division of self that comes with the territory. Deeply seeded in the recesses of their mind lies dorment a self-destructive compulsion aching to prove itself. So, when your done self-immolating, keep that flame going a little longer, I'll bring my marshmallows, chocolate, and gram crackers; we'll all roast smore's over your super hot body.

I love to hate.
My hatred burns with the intensity of a thousand suns.
It keeps me warm at night.

>>108
No, your countless layers of fat spanning your body keep you warm.

>>109
6'2" 195 lbs. Tanned and toned. 1 girlfriend, 1 on the side.

How do you rate compared to me?

>>110

I'm straight.

>>111
MOAR like straight into dozens of male anuses, AMIRITE?

>>110
I drive a Porsche

>>113
Good for you! I mean if that's all you can afford and all..lol

lol

>>113
I drive a penis

much better

Cry less, retards.

Less retardation, cryers.

Retards cry, less.

>>110
is gay