Hating Racists is Racist

All around me I see an incredible injustice being committed every day.  Thousands of racists are being discriminated against, being derided in the media, being shunned from social groups, and being avoided by the population at large.

Their genes are inferior, primative, dating back to prehistoric times, when tribes fought against each other, and had to have an easy way to convince themselves that they should irrationally hate their enemy nations.  Back then it was an advantage to believe that humans should be separated from each other, and that certain ones should be made into slaves or killed.

Racists aren't at fault for the way they are; it's their genes that determine that they will be racist.  Therefore, it's immoral to discriminate against them, they just can't help it.

>>51
>Your argument that we shouldn't at least try for equality is just morally dispicable. And if I wanted, I could resort to extreme examples as well. (We can't save all the kids being raped- so why try?)

And why do you think we don't try to stop every child being raped?
Equality is a stupid idea and nobody who lives with thier eyes opens gives it a shread of legitimacy, the manifest inequalities are too great for a government to repair. The only way it can be achieved is by crippling the strongest and the smartest, which is the obvious reason people who aren't living in la-la libfag land wouldn't support it.

>This person wishes to swear and shout at the same person or the same group of people over and over for the rest of their lives, this is not liberty, but the crime of harrasment.

It is liberty when the man being insulted can stop the other man from doing so.

>Maybe it isn't racism that is the problem, maybe it is discrimination itself, or crime.

So which one is the problem? That people discriminate or have any sort of discernment? You're mad my friend.

>Numbers don't lie.

You mean statistics don't lie? lol nice.

>You lose your version of this argument by resorting to using "nigger", in the first place. Someone like you, who's ideals seemed to be steeped in bigotry cannot be trusted to decide what or who is equal. You lack objectivity. Or rather, your version of it flaws the concept with a number of predispositions that you hold.

I'm not the poster you were replying to but. Do you know how stupid this ad hominem BS makes you sound? You must be a nigger is you can't see that.


I think >>1 makes a very good point. It is natural to discriminate racially therefore it isn't wrong. To say it is wrong, that somthing which is natural and predisposition of  human nature is wrong, is a hideious statement and completely opposed to what is fundementally right.

>>63
Claims that obvious biological facts are "a social construction" are themselves a social construction.

BAWWW DEY ARE DISKRIMINATING AGAINST MEE, THOSE EEEVIL PEOPLE ARE PUTTIN MEH DOWN FOR HATING NIGGERS, DATS THE SAME AS WAT I'M DOING BECAUSE CLEARLY MY PATHETICALLY TINY BRAIN CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE HURRR DURRRR

>>68
>>67
Double sage

>>68

Proof that every "black man" on the internet is a libfag troll.

>>70
What are you talking about, that's a genuine neocon kid

>> Equality is a stupid idea and nobody who lives with thier eyes opens gives it a shread of legitimacy, the manifest inequalities are too great for a government to repair. The only way it can be achieved is by crippling the strongest and the smartest, which is the obvious reason people who aren't living in la-la libfag land wouldn't support it.

You are very confused and very wrong. Equality as about as much of an "idea" as inequality is. You confuse equality, empathy and benevolence with totalitarianism and the mindfuck that is modern liberalism. Hide behind your equally dogmatic collectivist political rhetoric all you want, but they're just strawmen.

>> I'm not the poster you were replying to but. Do you know how stupid this ad hominem BS makes you sound? You must be a nigger is you can't see that.

"Nigger" is ad hominem BS, too. Nevertheless, my rejoinders don't sound half as stupid as someone who doesn't know the difference between "is" and "if".

>> It is natural to discriminate racially therefore it isn't wrong. To say it is wrong, that somthing which is natural and predisposition of  human nature is wrong, is a hideious statement and completely opposed to what is fundementally right.

Again, it's not upon the shoulders of someone as dumb as you to decide what's natural. Especially since you don't seem to understand that the opposite of your statement applies to human nature as well. Modern humans were born of savagery and stupidity and we have, somewhat, grown into more refined beings. This is something we've always strived for. I find it ironic that people who are so quick to equate others to cavemen, find themselves acting worse than actual cavemen. At least a neanderthals excuse is ignorance.

>>72 "Nigger" is ad hominem BS, too.
That would only be true if niggers were human.

>>71
Neo-cons ARE liberals.

>>72
>You confuse equality, empathy and benevolence with totalitarianism and the mindfuck that is modern liberalism. Hide behind your equally dogmatic collectivist political rhetoric all you want, but they're just strawmen.

You confuse "empathy" with "being a faggot", and "benevolence" with "giving extra special privilages".
Equality isn't just an idea when it is written into law and into government policy. We aren't discussing dictionaries here.

>"Nigger" is ad hominem BS, too.

No shit captin obvious.

>Again, it's not upon the shoulders of someone as dumb as you to decide what's natural. Especially since you don't seem to understand that the opposite of your statement applies to human nature as well.

But it doesn't apply anyway nearly as equally now does it?

>Modern humans were born of savagery and stupidity and we have, somewhat, grown into more refined beings. This is something we've always strived for.

Ha ha ha. "refined beings" hahaha. Where do you live man? Some leafy fucking liberal suburb ey? Whatever you do don't go outside.
People haven't changed in a thousand years. Society has changed, technology has changed. People, humans don't change.
If you equate; enforcing uniform public opinon with propaganda and law with "refinement" you're sorley mistaken.

>I find it ironic that people who are so quick to equate others to cavemen, find themselves acting worse than actual cavemen. At least a neanderthals excuse is ignorance.

Lawdy muh nigga. What was wrong with cavemen? I'm sure they wouldn't be so bad, why do you feel the need to discriminate against people so much?

>>You confuse "empathy" with "being a faggot", and "benevolence" with "giving extra special privilages". Equality isn't just an idea when it is written into law and into government policy. We aren't discussing dictionaries here.

Inequality based upon anything other than pure a priori objective evidence is "giving extra special privilages". Inequality isn't a naturally occuring idea when it's placed in law, either. But somehow I don't think you understand that we're not just discussing law here.

>>But it doesn't apply anyway nearly as equally now does it?

That's just your opinion. An opinion based on certain indefensible assumptions and obnoxious ingnorance mired in myopic thought.

>>Ha ha ha. "refined beings" hahaha. Where do you live man? Some leafy fucking liberal suburb ey? Whatever you do don't go outside. People haven't changed in a thousand years. Society has changed, technology has changed. People, humans don't change. If you equate; enforcing uniform public opinon with propaganda and law with "refinement" you're sorley mistaken.

I live, work and study in Downtown LA. The fact that I'm a black man living in a heavily urbanized area surrounded by a variety of ethics and classes probaby goes into my own thoughts on the subject. But again, this only matters if you lack the faculties of critical thought.

Listen, if you think that clear social and technological change isn't an indictator of a fundamental change in humanity then that's your retarded prerogative. Such as is my (non-retarded) belief of the opposite.

However, I am speaking to is the deterministic nature of mankind. I'm as pessemistic and cycinal as you about this world, but if you percieve and act on the perception that some human beings are just "inferior" than you are doing nothing more than expressing determination towards irrational fear, xenophobia and socioculturally enforced inequality which makes you just as fucking guilty as the people you're railing against like gay zealot.

I'm done with you, now.

>>75
Stay in LA, nigger. Don't come round hear. Naw mean?

>>76
O.k., I won't come around here no more (cuz I'm black).