Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Hating Racists is Racist

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-12 23:58

All around me I see an incredible injustice being committed every day.  Thousands of racists are being discriminated against, being derided in the media, being shunned from social groups, and being avoided by the population at large.

Their genes are inferior, primative, dating back to prehistoric times, when tribes fought against each other, and had to have an easy way to convince themselves that they should irrationally hate their enemy nations.  Back then it was an advantage to believe that humans should be separated from each other, and that certain ones should be made into slaves or killed.

Racists aren't at fault for the way they are; it's their genes that determine that they will be racist.  Therefore, it's immoral to discriminate against them, they just can't help it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 13:00

>>32
You are too stupid to understand my argument. Admit this later if you are too vain to admit this when you next reply, however if you don't reply I will assume you have accepted defeat.

I will redefine my argument as clearly as is grammatically possible, if you still do not understand it I ask that you commit suicide as quickly as possible.

Crimes is very bad for the victim and good for the perpetrator.
If you make a law which prevents crime it is good for a society as everyone in the society will not commit the crime as much and not as much bad will happen.
Sometimes when making laws people make unecessary laws, so we should not assume all laws are good for society.
There is a distinction between laws and what is good for society.
What is good for society is good for individuals and this involves preventing crime, even though crime may benefit the perpetrators.
If someone believes that what is good fo society is wrong, it is because they are criminals and wish to commit crimes that benefit them.
A person who is unwilling to admit this for fear of people knowing what he is may attempt to remove the distinction between laws and what is good for society and claim that ideas which are legitimately good for socciety are unecessary.

An extreme example would be child rape, but there are lesser examples, such as harrasment.

"Sometimes what's good for the community is bad for the individual. Do you want us to be more hiveminded and completely throw away our personality? I for one welcome our new borg overlords."

This person wishes to swear and shout at the same person or the same group of people over and over for the rest of their lives, this is not liberty, but the crime of harrasment. He is claiming that harrasment laws are unecessary as they do not permit him to commit the crime of harrasment.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List