Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 1:26

>>982


>> But that doesn't mean that a genetic component to someone's intelligence doesn't exist, or that it should be ignored.

Never said that it didn't exist, never said that it should be ignored. If it's a general rule, fine, I've always known that and accepted it. But, to me, dividing IQ among race- something that is based socially and culturally- is stupider than dividing IQ up by hieght or weight.

>> While there's not yet any accurate genetic survey which maps the genes responsible for intelligence, they have managed to find some genes which do regulate certain nervous system functions that are less prevalent among africans.

Not only that, we do not even have a "genetic IQ test". Only an environmental one. And I have still seen no proof that the scores here are from G-loaded test. Second: I'd like to see proof of what you're saying. Without data you have no scientific argument. Only co-relative theory.

>> What I'm saying is that europeans (cro-magnonoids etc) had a more harsh environment.  This did lead to many many changes in allele frequencies...  Possibly even some new mutant genes that might have been advantageous (this would be "evolution") but that hasn't been proven.  The same goes for caucasoids and asians.

THIS IS SUBJECTIVE. If anything the desert was the most harsh environement. When the whites came to places in Africa that were not like Europe- they couldn't survive. (Read Guns, Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond). 

And it's not that "it hasn't been proven" in regards to "mutated genes" it's that: IT DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST. Regardless, without proof your argument is one for myth, legend and maybes.

>>984

PRECISELY. There's not such thing as fate when it comes to genetics. If that was true then WE WOULDN'T HAVE SURVIVED SUB-SAHARA AFRICA AND WOULD HAVE DIED OFF. Regardless of the mental (or genetic) capacity someone is born with we as humans, no, as carbon based lifeforms have the ability to change with enough coaxing from our environment.

Newer Posts