I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>893

You're lying. Address what I've said to the effect of phenotypes and stop resorting to whining about "that be racisms". It's nonsense...because the reality is you have nothing to rebut with- so when I say that there's really no such thing as ethnic allele frequencies what you hear is: "YOU'RE RACIST!". The disconnect lies with you. It's a pattern of behavior that has become your trademark in this thread.

>>894

No, you're not putting them above you. You're lumping them in with you on a heirarchy where the perception is that your "race" is above other "races". There's no way around this- your theory is united around a theory of "the darker the dumber".

It's just not the case. Regardless, if Asians are so smart where is their power on the world stage? Maybe intelligence isn't as important as you think it is when it comes to world power and so called great civilizations. <=== This completely shatters any notion that IQ has anything to do with "catching up with the rest of the world". Did you ignore the point I made about the general population >>892 on purpose?

>>895

I never you said you were lying. Again: You're only hearing what you want to hear. I said that the reasons for any gaps in IQ aren't genetic- there are several reasons one of them being that  Intelligence isn't solely about genetics. Think about it: Genetics alone doesn't contribute to IQ, so genetics alone can't be responsible for IQ difference. What is so hard understand?

Environment is paramount in gaining learned behavior. You only question the black/hispanic student's ability to learn using intelligence and not the white/asain/whatever teacher's ability to use intelligence to TEACH properly. A majority of the teachers in America are white and meanwhile we're behind every other country in pretty much everything academic. What does that tell you about intelligence? What does that tell you about the percieved intelligence of white people? Acknowledge and answer.

Third, you don't even fucking know me. "Black pride"? Yeah, I'm black, what of it? But fuck black people. Don't you see you're doing the exact same thing you accuse the opposition of? By even bringing up black pride, you're calling me a racist. Because that's what "black pride" is: RACISM.

I don't even BLIEVE IN RACE! So how can I be a "racist"? The only thing I have pride in is the absolute truth. You need to just deal with the fact that either (A) You're not smart enough and don't have access to enough information to win this debate. Or (B) YOU ARE WRONG.