I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>891

Um, yes it is. That is the debate we're having because "stock" is determined by perception and region not by any absolute biological "racial" indicators. (Do you even understand what this means?)

Facial features and skin color has nothing to do with the brain. I smashed this pathetic notion awhile back when the opposition trumped out the skull shapes argument. Breeding is Breeding. It doesn't matter if the person is black, white or whatever. Dumb genes are dumb genes.

With that in mind it becomes plain to see that your entire argument hinges on the gamble that all Sub-Saharan Africans are "genetically dumb" in the first place and "didn't have civilization". It hinges on the total ignorance of a number of prevalent (more prevalent than genetics) environmental factors that have contributed to the current infrastructure situation in Africa.

These points have been addressed. So much to the point that several have conceeded to it, due to them having no other way to outargue the fact. There are so called "smarter civilizations" that were destroyed *before* so called "dumber generations". What does that tell you about intelligence and our perception of it? Just ask yourself that.

You need to acknowledge that factually speaking general populations of people aren't responsible for the progress of the civilizations: Individuals are.

And the reason those who argue for your viewpoint call you a racist is because race is the focus of your argument. But what about IQ corresponding to height, weight, gender, hair color, social and cultural affiliations?

The reason you don't appeal to these factors is because they support an environmental force over IQ and that destroys the point you're desperately trying to get across: "Whites are supreme."

Even more surprising, you're trying to lump Asians in with whites on the racial heirarchy. The truth is: The very idea of a "white race" is a fallacy to begin with. Maybe you should look into who started calling people "white" and "black" in the first place and for what reasons before you rail off on the relevance of this delusional co-relationship between race and IQ?