Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: A. Wyatt Mann 2006-03-21 3:45 (sage)

>>890
It's not whether a stock is pure or not, it's the quality of what went into it in the first place.  This is as true of cattle as of humans.

So we have pure stocks:

Ashkenazi Jews, average IQ in the 120-125 range
Japanese, average IQ in the 110 range
Laplanders of northern Finland, average IQ in the 70 range

And mixed stocks:

American Negroes (20% white, 80% sub-Saharan African), IQ in the 80 range
White-Asian hybrids, IQ in the 110-115 range

Human beings are like any other animals:  machines built to a genetic blueprint.  The brain is like any other organ:  its structure and function are decided by the genes.  Not all genes are equal.  And if individuals can carry different genes, how could you possibly decide that groups of human beings must be genetically substantially identical in the aggregate?

You can hide from the truth, you can deny the truth, but truth can't be hidden forever, especially when it's all around us every day, visible to anyone who has the inner strength to open his eyes and look at it without cringing.

Newer Posts