I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>735
Interesting how you have no real response to the information at hand.  Guess now that I cleared one branch of the argument, you have to retreat into another portion of it. 

Maybe Africans had some civilization, but I don't know that much about history. (anyone with more information on it?)  All I know is that for some strange reason, all the civilizations that had any effect on the rest of the world up until the current era have not been black african.  For some weird reason they seem to radiate from the middle east, a predominantly caucasian area.  Maybe it's because we won history, and therefore we have the authority to control it, but I'm not so sure.  Last I checked, supremacist crackers don't identify with middle easterners (sand niggers). 

Also, the hittites failed because the assyrians conquered them.  The Assyrians were an even greater empire than the hittites, and they had copied their metal working skill by this time.  Things are incredibly random.  But one thing is not random; intelligence separated us from all the other animals, enabled us to inhabit every ecological niche on the planet.  Is it not conceivable that intelligence can make a difference on a more minor level?

Also, I don't have any ideals.  The only, THE ONLY thing I'm saying is that intelligence can make a difference. You have yet to show how such a line of thinking has anything to do with totalitarianism(except in science fiction), unless you mean the totalitarianism of our own genes. 

(BTW, in case you're too incredibly stupid to realize it, all my usage of racial epithets is facetious.  Don't start using it to assign me motives)


BTW, I'd like to congratulate
>>739
>>738
>>736
for turning this thread into interesting discussion.